From: "Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>
To: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Beat Bolli <dev+git@drbeat.li>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] merge-file: consider core.crlf when writing merge markers
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 07:31:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A31E56.9040700@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0c775ea7a9ba3244748b784241de685cefc73b1.1453482052.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
On 2016-01-22 18.01, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> From: Beat Bolli <dev+git@drbeat.li>
>
> When merging files in repos with core.eol = crlf, git merge-file inserts
> just a LF at the end of the merge markers. Files with mixed line endings
> cause trouble in Windows editors and e.g. contrib/git-jump, where an
> unmerged file in a run of "git jump merge" is reported as simply "binary
> file matches".
>
> Fixing this improves merge-file's behavior under Windows.
>
> The original version of this patch also modified ll_merge(), but that
> was incorrect: low-level merge operates on blobs, not on working files.
> Therefore, the data passed to the low-level merge, as well as its
> result, is expected to have LF-only line endings.
>
> It is the duty of ll_merge()'s *caller* (in case of Git's `merge`
> command, the merge_content() function) to convert the merge result into
> the correct working file contents, and ll_merge() should not muck with
> line endings at all.
>
> Signed-off-by: Beat Bolli <dev+git@drbeat.li>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> ---
> builtin/merge-file.c | 1 +
> t/t6023-merge-file.sh | 14 ++++++++++++++
> xdiff/xdiff.h | 1 +
> xdiff/xmerge.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
> 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/merge-file.c b/builtin/merge-file.c
> index 5544705..9ce830a 100644
> --- a/builtin/merge-file.c
> +++ b/builtin/merge-file.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ int cmd_merge_file(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> argv[i]);
> }
>
> + xmp.crlf = eol_for_path(names[0], NULL, 0) == EOL_CRLF;
2 comments:
What happens when the original file already has CRLF ?
And why don't we feed any content into the function ?
When the source is already in CRLF, do we need to add any CR ?
Or is the content feed into the merge machine always normalized ?
And in this case you can skip this comment completely.
> xmp.ancestor = names[1];
> xmp.file1 = names[0];
> xmp.file2 = names[2];
> diff --git a/t/t6023-merge-file.sh b/t/t6023-merge-file.sh
> index 190ee90..a131749 100755
> --- a/t/t6023-merge-file.sh
> +++ b/t/t6023-merge-file.sh
> @@ -346,4 +346,18 @@ test_expect_success 'conflict at EOF without LF resolved by --union' \
> printf "line1\nline2\nline3x\nline3y" >expect.txt &&
> test_cmp expect.txt output.txt'
>
> +test_expect_success 'conflict markers contain CRLF when core.eol=crlf' '
> + test_must_fail git -c core.eol=crlf merge-file -p \
> + nolf-diff1.txt nolf-orig.txt nolf-diff2.txt >output.txt &&
> + test $(sed -n "/\.txt\r$/p" output.txt | wc -l) = 3
$(wc -l) == 3 tends to be non-portable - either use "test .. -eq" or
use test_line_count()
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'conflict markers heed gitattributes over core.eol=crlf' '
> + git config core.eol crlf &&
> + echo "*.txt eol=lf" >>.gitattributes &&
> + test_must_fail git -c core.eol=crlf merge-file -p \
> + nolf-diff1.txt nolf-orig.txt nolf-diff2.txt >output.txt &&
> + test $(sed -n "/\.txt\r$/p" output.txt | wc -l) = 0
Same here
And If I remember that "\r" in sed is non-portable, Ramsay suggested a nice fix:
gmane/283262
"t6023 broken under Mac OS"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-23 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-22 17:01 [PATCH 0/2] Let merge-file write out conflict markers with correct EOLs Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-22 17:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] convert: add a helper to determine the correct EOL for a given path Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-22 18:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-22 19:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-23 7:05 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2016-01-24 10:42 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-23 6:12 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2016-01-24 10:41 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-22 17:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] merge-file: consider core.crlf when writing merge markers Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-22 18:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-22 18:47 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-22 19:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-24 10:44 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-22 19:50 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-01-22 19:52 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-01-24 10:37 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-24 18:26 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-01-25 7:02 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-23 6:31 ` Torsten Bögershausen [this message]
2016-01-24 10:39 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-22 17:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] Let merge-file write out conflict markers with correct EOLs Beat Bolli
2016-01-24 10:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-24 10:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] merge-file: let conflict markers match end-of-line style of the context Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-24 16:27 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2016-01-24 16:36 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2016-01-25 6:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-25 19:45 ` Ramsay Jones
2016-01-26 8:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-26 16:43 ` Ramsay Jones
2016-01-26 16:49 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-24 22:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] Let merge-file write out conflict markers with correct EOLs Junio C Hamano
2016-01-25 7:25 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-25 8:06 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-25 8:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] merge-file: let conflict markers match end-of-line style of the context Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-25 8:32 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2016-01-25 8:59 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-25 20:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-26 9:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-26 17:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-25 8:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] merge-file: ensure that conflict sections match eol style Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-25 9:20 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-26 14:42 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Let merge-file write out conflict markers with correct EOLs Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-26 14:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] merge-file: let conflict markers match end-of-line style of the context Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-26 18:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-26 21:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-27 7:58 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-27 18:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-27 19:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-27 19:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-28 7:55 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-26 14:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] merge-file: ensure that conflict sections match eol style Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-27 16:37 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] Let merge-file write out conflict markers with correct EOLs Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-27 16:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] merge-file: let conflict markers match end-of-line style of the context Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-27 16:37 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] merge-file: ensure that conflict sections match eol style Johannes Schindelin
2016-01-27 20:22 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] Let merge-file write out conflict markers with correct EOLs Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56A31E56.9040700@web.de \
--to=tboegi@web.de \
--cc=dev+git@drbeat.li \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).