From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Stefan_Fr=c3=bchwirth?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] merge_blobs: use strbuf instead of manually-sized mmfile_t Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:48:01 +0100 Message-ID: <56C70F01.9060609@uni-graz.at> References: <56C2459B.5060805@uni-graz.at> <20160216011258.GA11961@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160216050915.GA5765@flurp.local> <20160216055043.GB28237@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Sunshine , To: Junio C Hamano , Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 19 13:48:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aWkTi-0000NR-R6 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:48:11 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757376AbcBSMsF (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:48:05 -0500 Received: from EX07HTCA01.UNI-GRAZ.AT ([143.50.13.79]:25256 "EHLO ex07htca01.uni-graz.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757175AbcBSMsE (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:48:04 -0500 Received: from EX13MS01.pers.ad.uni-graz.at (2002:8f32:dbf::8f32:dbf) by ex07htca01.pers.ad.uni-graz.at (2002:8f32:d4f::8f32:d4f) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.406.0; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:48:02 +0100 Received: from [143.50.233.116] (143.50.233.116) by EX13MS01.pers.ad.uni-graz.at (2002:8f32:dbf::8f32:dbf) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:48:01 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 In-Reply-To: X-ClientProxiedBy: EX13MS04.pers.ad.uni-graz.at (2002:8f32:dc2::8f32:dc2) To EX13MS01.pers.ad.uni-graz.at (2002:8f32:dbf::8f32:dbf) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 2016-02-16 at 22:27 Junio C Hamano wrote: > Three, I know the existence of the program is not more than "we > could do something like this" illustration by Linus, and its output > is in no way _designed_ to be so. We know today that it does not do Well, then it is just really sad that the manpage doesn't say so. This should be corrected immediately in order to prevent someone to build more (e.g.) libraries on top of it. Stefan