From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ext7.scm.com (ext7.scm.com [49.12.148.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB42D819 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2025 08:09:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=49.12.148.225 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738224583; cv=none; b=K5tZRcn6BOLhpj/VwNc3VA+Fn/SBBQh58YSrmDoSUKd8/RqTtAI1LwrIypc95S8/JQTxo7bHCr7zkpuH+x97CW7c7xWVIiv2OgkI/NNIc+wAC9SxV3FIXG1kt4+IL04h/vMgj7pMXUCjhM/icoeKEk1REDVww0cW8x5EGuxX85g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738224583; c=relaxed/simple; bh=G6YvynOVybU5zvJfXvzIaMwVAuzLKkRTz8P9oJnNeI0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=t/mO0oC9pMY3WzT4CU12bA1FnVUtRQb0RAMvEi6SXtlS9sUs9a6154Oe35T16bj4zd7e/wmZNSOjHhizqPHAarU7iUYX2lC0hQCQ2+Cw+x/puzZBJWYLU/JEIY4y1e2hOlS5R48HYDF8x0rpWkI07LfxCKGr4WTTpe1gIlrh84E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=scm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=scm.com; dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=scm.com header.i=@scm.com header.b=MSPtlrVT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=49.12.148.225 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=scm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=scm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=scm.com header.i=@scm.com header.b="MSPtlrVT" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=scm.com; s=ext7dkim24; t=1738224574; bh=G6YvynOVybU5zvJfXvzIaMwVAuzLKkRTz8P9oJnNeI0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MSPtlrVTB9zYKE4m+QGt+4jp/OGnm0B70guYHe9FvdnJ09x1xt11NG4ecZU7EG4SU SKgxTVOAOw3oE8KxOp/5LyhAxCSvMAXJADKXvHqIaL2KL4ATY9EnG6cIxdWGSRfMRd jTSxPOfhmSJWSqopbf1xHxVkPhSwfA7zQlvleyE/JsYUDT+Ls0FO7Rq8yA6uoaD7zD kGnm7HpYmqDmSB33/LeGbEgnLzXGtBOVHJJo8lFLZzy4Z8flunUQviafHK/boR1ljU adRe7f25aMhg8HljgPHdsAlmnBJSQ0iB5qptaqy0P3XvpuGtxUdlT8K17uIXPj8CJa IDJR5eTwu3Gg6hpc/H/SR0YZon8CJTs9/zQfGjFRbZXwpFk5DG/zPgJ3pN2hW0q3B5 f10/xjxJ0FcORDjCdec0K4xDL72fEKRiM9VIv08+12NkdrZlcuGDPUDKFG3tEY4cNo /8sXIWzE7rNYtnbnyaOoeLYfZAjPbUA7iQ5VWDRVaQ+jyzRN8DNqA1gVQm2biILBuu DBK/1/pINhreKCR2I/6hdaAUbLEDxI7gNK3qS4LTcL6fw05zIS1lgUW+00qY8hqX1j gRxQ4N4dDJAy4ef48qHnobj6J8pE7d/dL4cKnL/7fphs14wVTrd2Ad4edSix+DzXXO UD/+p7lIQ0iAKOnYj65SwRL0= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ext7.scm.com From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9tw6HFoQ==?= Trnka To: "brian m. carlson" , git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Taylor Blau , Junio C Hamano , Jeff King Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH resend] builtin/repack: Honor --keep-pack and .keep when repacking promisor objects Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 09:09:32 +0100 Message-ID: <5706247.IbC2pHGDlb@electra> In-Reply-To: References: <2728513.vuYhMxLoTh@mintaka.ncbr.muni.cz> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Thursday, 30 January 2025 3:26:19, CET brian m. carlson wrote: > I don't have a strong opinion about the technical aspects of this patch > (nor sufficient knowledge to review it)[0], but I noticed that there's a > couple of places, this line among them, which are unexpectedly wrapped, > so I don't believe this patch will actually apply. Oops, my sincere apologies to everyone. I'll resend once again. (I messed up by not realizing that KMail will re-enable line wrapping when re- sending my original message, which was formatted correctly.) 2T