From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D206F20954 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 21:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752615AbdLDVeI (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:34:08 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-f169.google.com ([209.85.128.169]:41143 "EHLO mail-wr0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752073AbdLDVeH (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:34:07 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-f169.google.com with SMTP id z18so18931534wrb.8 for ; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 13:34:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=BQ8TCh1ArOg+gxkylgdFACvgtKFnOmpMLNq/m5CV7N8=; b=NkZHzzbqstmk7A6CwqCuSIorzfPBijmx+crSjn1uiF9/7a4Dk+aZvtwCJ9zl3CzzoC 52zOjxQ4il3aAPvTfjQpT34ejnNVNfsuhM/oSx6B9Uj5Z3kaxP6o7S9Ibo38Ixm3ze1E przjtM7DJYWqoluObUG21Slsc3c1bV4KKGrxcibK8RHUfxS6bl6M4Si4oyY1eA1AVQQr JxoCtbxEM7JlfINp6Pb9JiL5O95aBtnayXjlt4WowFrflfPVr0MmJevHAR24u88eK0Nt M+RuVuqvLsmd4/QFk8P9eFA/cbQslnLLgIiy8tkxLPODBkekt8kKqFJu6kiWCFircybS 6uYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=BQ8TCh1ArOg+gxkylgdFACvgtKFnOmpMLNq/m5CV7N8=; b=nKnEbGR5vannyC8QYxyBh5uwobOshUjA8GGpnUALze9WKxV8eEcGEZw6kHNWtdwq+j jZJDY+Ojb/pIjijgP+bbmXPpw4IWg1VFjDS+IfaKI3MH7jc2zKgRZxiCW+7qhIjSVxdE 61EXj3sklUP8xZYJAFLJqqyVjGeg7Hufy0yhwikDc47maGKNG9uN1qjEgLp78DdJ+Xai zYSdlgOzOCLCkyaiuDQdSqSQOu4VVCOFHluo7CwB1Nl04nCD36iDVbL9St9sYt7Cp8J5 1cJuzwabKUTqGOeQXH5hn2fn9xK3MTtrhh6tFUKjj+/cJVXvq/pZ8W9gCf4j7hESAHtL qI2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6GiuE3dRpECJguEcFpJSAjGncBJkaYUxaw55X5e8bTMedip81d 6wSIRf5mgsYyvlfNicwZ07U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaed67TXAWqeIpcRixVEqyrZ7qL+s5Yu31RkemOcwVqcGXPKN+Bu1TSyvza7AFcIDNHX52N/A== X-Received: by 10.223.201.2 with SMTP id m2mr13174369wrh.274.1512423246161; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 13:34:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from slxbook4.fritz.box (p5DDB6B70.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.219.107.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i8sm13362032wrb.29.2017.12.04.13.34.05 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Dec 2017 13:34:05 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] launch_editor(): indicate that Git waits for user input From: Lars Schneider In-Reply-To: <20171204173223.GF13332@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 22:34:04 +0100 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Lars Schneider , Git List , Stefan Beller , Eric Sunshine , kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com, sandals@crustytoothpaste.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <599BA6A0-0CAB-4C77-8428-F7E46064DF14@gmail.com> References: <20171129143752.60553-1-lars.schneider@autodesk.com> <20171129143752.60553-3-lars.schneider@autodesk.com> <20171130205137.GC3313@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20171204173223.GF13332@sigill.intra.peff.net> To: Jeff King X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org > On 04 Dec 2017, at 18:32, Jeff King wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 01:47:04PM +0100, Lars Schneider wrote: > >> I am on the fence here. I like consistency but I don't want to >> bother Git users. >> >> @Peff: Do you lean into either direction? Could you imagine that >> novice/regular users are bothered? (I don't expect experts to be >> bothered too much as they would likely be able to find and set >> the advice config). > > I also am on the fence, and am OK with any of the options discussed. > > But now I've said my reservations on the list, so I can say "I told you > so" if people complain (and naturally refuse to admit my objections if > people love it). :) Well, since you and I are on the fence, I will follow Junio. Then we can at least argue that the feature is consistent on all terminals. - Lars