From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E11BC48BDF for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:05:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26F6611CC for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:05:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231286AbhFRQIE (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2021 12:08:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39026 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230151AbhFRQIC (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2021 12:08:02 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x236.google.com (mail-oi1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::236]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13043C061574 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:05:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x236.google.com with SMTP id s17so2300777oij.11 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:05:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QMVSPOsrks1S27MTxQgZ2UvHmMpW4mMAqVMI7DJ7Jjk=; b=IrF79JxeoyCE1TnfF5smb6ypfQTDVjej0515IJ6RsWom4a0PWc/QfMjVFlIGESLFat I4QMbYmFtI1Pj2sdNx47VBAKq3pohfico8OZMnGUMiHEnnw5H5ipkyUXUnBR/qxNoZJm IxvCXszOi0iygAIKTOxt880DOska3N6lVrfWHfgIyz2YYHnxsBp00HOVwMHpEyDL76j5 tKPifguGLbsTLcwp3vGxzHMKn8aRpYDekfoMedlHw0J63tDRQekukbvWr9Wds2PgKixA Ye3e6RBo7l45fUdghy5e0ycQo6u7AbcfJLPHwCycaST3nemNSUtETAno3P2qAJY5DObp yfqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QMVSPOsrks1S27MTxQgZ2UvHmMpW4mMAqVMI7DJ7Jjk=; b=PPrFzbUqpBXC/Y6obLYskc1VuiPs6YpSSYmzM/31z5APw/fOzpSFPvxZOmZW6JUNgz LIcy4hGMyBnRiJqv/SQKukAtyMu6hbODI/IUABBgXIALq1K/MCmlhqi811FYCUbByRlq cu8AeCbbLPep4xN+NhaKlv4KxJgGMby7Bwlby3mUQKftJOyZMsluBHlqrVKgSWQFL6eb bzbW8o2Pxhzj71U3GEM1XWyzqt3arfIOUR4JZpW1/Vr5cXBA+abtG0Cv8aXpTeCG/I6f SgscLFOmI8cQCGu8S9M9S1mkSoCbGnfhgdnmE958+ZqHAtq6FmkVX14MF29Hp1j44Kb1 Smvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Yk+U9UkPz+QjGH3e54OYm0XNFjs3KKtoENvf9Fk/RCQTAjjEE hKm8KzH18SGQEvfpo/7ULes= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyHSP1KxFWJbujoVzwHb8bkHRGHpBiwNq+IJiC3SlLOj56shJY6BYr9NoLLo862ssS6WHhQjA== X-Received: by 2002:aca:1809:: with SMTP id h9mr4354165oih.4.1624032352513; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (fixed-187-188-155-231.totalplay.net. [187.188.155.231]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f2sm1880590ooj.22.2021.06.18.09.05.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 11:05:45 -0500 From: Felipe Contreras To: Bagas Sanjaya , Felipe Contreras , git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Junio C Hamano , Jonathan Nieder , Jeff King Message-ID: <60ccc459c5dd8_5eaa22086e@natae.notmuch> In-Reply-To: <35417819-3b25-e346-436a-a2090a8f8c43@gmail.com> References: <60cc1749b1c4d_5d12520825@natae.notmuch> <35417819-3b25-e346-436a-a2090a8f8c43@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Only 27% of reviewed-by tags are explicit, and much more Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On 18/06/21 10.47, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > I think it's fair to say our Documentation/SubmittingPatches needs to be > > updated. > > With what new procedure? After any reviews? Something like this: . `Reviewed-by:`, means the reviewer is completely satisfied with the patch after a detailed analysis. Unlike other tags, it's recommended that the reviewers themselves offer it. It is recommended, not a must. -- Felipe Contreras