git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com>,
	Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>,
	Son Luong Ngoc <sluongng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] pull: handle conflicting rebase/merge options via last option wins
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 16:56:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <60f200a49dac3_14cb2089b@natae.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqwnpqot4m.fsf@gitster.g>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >     <unset>     *        --no-rebase            merge --ff
> >     only        *        --no-rebase            merge --ff[2]
> >     false       *        --no-rebase            merge --no-ff
> >     true        *        --no-rebase            merge --ff
> 
> I think the second one deserves an explanation.  The rationale for
> ignoring --ff-only is because the act of giving an explicit
> "--rebase" or "--no-rebase" from the command line, when the
> configured default is "I expect to have no development on my own
> here, and only want to follow along", is a sign enough that the user
> does not want to follow along in this particular invocation of
> "pull".  And the rationale for the entire thing to become --ff is
> only because between --ff and --no-ff, the former is the default.
> 
> About the second one, I would understand it if it became "merge
> --ff-only", too.  That is more trivially explained.  I however
> suspect that it would be less useful, but that is open to
> discussion.

It would be very hard to explain in the documentation why these are
different:

  git -c pull.ff=only pull --merge
  git pull --ff-only --merge

And this of course will break behavior for people that arely already
relying on pull.ff=only to do --ff-only (as it was its whole purpose).

Not to mention that this isn't even listed in the table:

  git -c pull.ff=only pull

As well as *all* the configurations with no command line arguments.

-- 
Felipe Contreras

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-16 21:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-15  2:40 [PATCH 0/5] Handle conflicting pull options Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-15  2:40 ` [PATCH 1/5] pull: move definitions of parse_config_rebase and parse_opt_rebase Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-15  2:40 ` [PATCH 2/5] pull: convert OPT_PASSTHRU for fast-forward options to OPT_CALLBACK Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-15  2:40 ` [PATCH 3/5] pull: handle conflicting rebase/merge options via last option wins Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-15  4:59   ` Eric Sunshine
2021-07-15 17:13     ` Elijah Newren
2021-07-15  9:44   ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-15 17:33   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-15 17:46     ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-15 19:04     ` Elijah Newren
2021-07-15 19:58       ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-15 20:40         ` Elijah Newren
2021-07-15 21:12           ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-16 18:39             ` Elijah Newren
2021-07-16 21:18               ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-16 21:56                 ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2021-07-15 20:17       ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-15 20:38         ` Elijah Newren
2021-07-15  2:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] pull: abort if --ff-only is given and fast-forwarding is impossible Alex Henrie via GitGitGadget
2021-07-15  2:40 ` [PATCH 5/5] pull: abort by default when fast-forwarding is not possible Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-15  5:18   ` Eric Sunshine
2021-07-15 16:56     ` Elijah Newren
2021-07-15  9:48   ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-16  9:32   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-07-16 18:13     ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-15  9:37 ` [PATCH 0/5] Handle conflicting pull options Felipe Contreras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=60f200a49dac3_14cb2089b@natae.notmuch \
    --to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexhenrie24@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=sluongng@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).