From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Alex Henrie" <alexhenrie24@gmail.com>,
"Son Luong Ngoc" <sluongng@gmail.com>,
"Matthias Baumgarten" <matthias.baumgarten@aixigo.com>,
"Eric Sunshine" <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Elijah Newren" <newren@gmail.com>,
"Elijah Newren" <newren@gmail.com>,
"Elijah Newren" <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/8] t7601: test interaction of merge/rebase/fast-forward flags and options
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 07:24:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60f811ffd40b8_1305dc2082a@natae.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <175609272110e4f8d71dce3e6c4e6ca010a8f366.1626831744.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
>
> The interaction of rebase and merge flags and options was not well
> tested. Add several tests to check for correct behavior from the
> following rules:
> * --ff-only vs. --[no-]rebase
> (and the related pull.ff=only vs. pull.rebase)
> * --rebase[=!false] vs. --no-ff and --ff
> (and the related pull.rebase=!false overrides pull.ff=!only)
This breaks current behavior.
> * command line flags take precedence over config, except:
> * --no-rebase heeds pull.ff=!only
> * pull.rebase=!false vs --no-ff and --ff
This isn't explaind anywhere.
> --- a/t/t7601-merge-pull-config.sh
> +++ b/t/t7601-merge-pull-config.sh
> @@ -143,6 +143,188 @@
> +#
> +# Group 1: Interaction of --ff-only with --[no-]rebase
> +# (And related interaction of pull.ff=only with pull.rebase)
> +#
> +test_expect_failure '--ff-only overrides --rebase' '
> + test_attempts_fast_forward pull --rebase --ff-only
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_failure '--ff-only overrides --rebase even if first' '
> + test_attempts_fast_forward pull --ff-only --rebase
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success '--ff-only overrides --no-rebase' '
> + test_attempts_fast_forward pull --ff-only --no-rebase
> +'
These make absolutely no sense. Why does --rebase override pull.ff=only,
but not --ff-only?
> +test_expect_failure 'pull.ff=only overrides pull.rebase=true' '
> + test_attempts_fast_forward -c pull.ff=only -c pull.rebase=true pull
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'pull.ff=only overrides pull.rebase=false' '
> + test_attempts_fast_forward -c pull.ff=only -c pull.rebase=false pull
> +'
This breaks existing behavior.
Users expect `-c pull.ff=only -c pull.rebase=true` to do a rebase.
> +test_expect_failure '--no-rebase takes precedence over pull.ff=only' '
> + test_falls_back_to_full_merge -c pull.ff=only pull --no-rebase
> +'
This breaks existing behavior.
--
Felipe Contreras
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-21 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-17 15:41 [PATCH 0/9] Handle pull option precedence Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-17 15:41 ` [PATCH 1/9] t7601: add relative precedence tests for merge and rebase flags/options Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-17 18:03 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-19 18:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-20 17:10 ` Elijah Newren
2021-07-20 18:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-20 20:29 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-17 15:41 ` [PATCH 2/9] t7601: add tests of interactions with multiple merge heads and config Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-17 18:04 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-20 23:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-21 0:45 ` Elijah Newren
2021-07-17 15:41 ` [PATCH 3/9] pull: abort if --ff-only is given and fast-forwarding is impossible Alex Henrie via GitGitGadget
2021-07-17 18:14 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-17 15:41 ` [PATCH 4/9] pull: since --ff-only overrides, handle it first Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-17 18:22 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-17 15:41 ` [PATCH 5/9] pull: ensure --rebase overrides ability to ff Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-17 18:25 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-20 23:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-21 0:14 ` Elijah Newren
2021-07-17 15:41 ` [PATCH 6/9] pull: make --rebase and --no-rebase override pull.ff=only Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-17 18:28 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-20 23:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-21 0:09 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-17 15:41 ` [PATCH 7/9] pull: abort by default when fast-forwarding is not possible Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-17 18:31 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-17 15:41 ` [PATCH 8/9] pull: update docs & code for option compatibility with rebasing Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-21 0:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-21 0:44 ` Elijah Newren
2021-07-21 1:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-17 15:41 ` [PATCH 9/9] pull: fix handling of multiple heads Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-17 18:39 ` [PATCH 0/9] Handle pull option precedence Felipe Contreras
2021-07-21 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-21 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] t7601: test interaction of merge/rebase/fast-forward flags and options Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-21 12:24 ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2021-07-21 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] t7601: add tests of interactions with multiple merge heads and config Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-21 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] pull: abort if --ff-only is given and fast-forwarding is impossible Alex Henrie via GitGitGadget
2021-07-21 12:25 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-21 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] pull: since --ff-only overrides, handle it first Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-21 19:18 ` Matthias Baumgarten
2021-07-21 21:18 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-21 20:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-22 3:42 ` Elijah Newren
2021-07-21 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] pull: make --rebase and --no-rebase override pull.ff=only Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-21 12:26 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-21 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] pull: abort by default when fast-forwarding is not possible Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-21 12:27 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-21 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] pull: update docs & code for option compatibility with rebasing Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-21 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] pull: fix handling of multiple heads Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-21 12:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] Handle pull option precedence Felipe Contreras
2021-07-22 5:04 ` [PATCH v3 " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-22 5:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] t7601: test interaction of merge/rebase/fast-forward flags and options Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-22 5:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] t7601: add tests of interactions with multiple merge heads and config Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-22 5:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] pull: abort if --ff-only is given and fast-forwarding is impossible Alex Henrie via GitGitGadget
2021-07-22 5:04 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] pull: since --ff-only overrides, handle it first Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-22 5:04 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] pull: make --rebase and --no-rebase override pull.ff=only Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-22 5:04 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] pull: abort by default when fast-forwarding is not possible Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-22 5:04 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] pull: update docs & code for option compatibility with rebasing Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-22 5:04 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] pull: fix handling of multiple heads Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-07-22 7:09 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] Handle pull option precedence Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60f811ffd40b8_1305dc2082a@natae.notmuch \
--to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=alexhenrie24@gmail.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=matthias.baumgarten@aixigo.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=sluongng@gmail.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).