From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wincent Colaiuta Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use time_t for timestamps returned by approxidate() instead of unsigned Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:37:09 +0100 Message-ID: <643EB4C4-D3A9-41B9-AE1B-00D71B4CA9F9@wincent.com> References: <1232665622-5110-1-git-send-email-tim.henigan@gmail.com> <32c343770901240813k2eeb19b0q65b533f829cb44d4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com To: Tim Henigan X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 24 17:38:50 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LQlWs-0005Do-GQ for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:38:42 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755457AbZAXQhT convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:37:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755362AbZAXQhT (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:37:19 -0500 Received: from wincent1.inetu.net ([209.235.192.161]:51364 "EHLO wincent1.inetu.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754977AbZAXQhS convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:37:18 -0500 Received: from cuzco.lan (139.pool85-53-3.dynamic.orange.es [85.53.3.139]) (authenticated bits=0) by wincent1.inetu.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0OGbAJJ015022 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:37:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <32c343770901240813k2eeb19b0q65b533f829cb44d4@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: El 24/1/2009, a las 17:13, Tim Henigan escribi=F3: > Should I update the GitWiki page to remove this Janitor task or do yo= u > keep it as a test to see if people are properly searching the mail > archives? I don't know of too many projects which intentionally publish =20 misleading information to "test" would-be contributors. I think =20 editing the wiki would be a good idea. Cheers, Wincent