From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bsmtp5.bon.at (bsmtp5.bon.at [195.3.86.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37EA128DB48 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2025 15:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.3.86.187 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752075840; cv=none; b=sIEg/zuPBEubxHXe+ne1c1YkjoUdfCErXuiXQXSa+HZZEyA+K0p3o9wU9d4ip1j+69cGh1OgT52PtKu0KfhqK73TgFUcQA0HIniJ0NjbE6ud6GHKZfKS5+yyCEwUFpAfui+TbhV+VxG5NZfK46jjlYbj0+KSO9xtAiGsTmW9L2w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752075840; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9dkaYNCFMx0ByeRhVIH7TG33FdpWRbF4XzsOQGk2lv0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Xhn01XHWlVXL65Fa1SxLompHcmdlXM9AmlTjnQTD6YbUHSTnSSWNvntNWtpRY1BlIl64QJwRikibeoD+SF7zzi93Uj/ll3CPa9Z/JScZsGcqrLnoc4e2tTxH3gV3qfPMoIkmngIr1Ax6+GnGy6AEI2uvs1mqGZZ4uUCv+Ey3tf4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kdbg.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kdbg.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.3.86.187 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kdbg.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kdbg.org Received: from bsmtp3.bon.at (unknown [192.168.181.107]) by bsmtp5.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4bch974q4yz7QTlK for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2025 17:04:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.106] (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp3.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4bch8z2Bj9zRpKH; Wed, 9 Jul 2025 17:04:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <668ce4d4-3b60-47e0-a4a5-dbf73efd1e75@kdbg.org> Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 17:04:51 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2025, #02; Mon, 7) Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?Q?Carlo_Marcelo_Arenas_Bel=C3=B3n?= Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, phillip.wood123@gmail.com, Junio C Hamano References: From: Johannes Sixt In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Am 09.07.25 um 12:41 schrieb Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón: > CC: Johannes Sixt on feedback for SIGCHLD in mingw which uses 17 instead > of 22 (cygwin and others) and therefore seem to cause signal to err > without setting errno as it should. I don't know what the relevance of the actual number of a signal is. Nobody is supposed to use the number, only the macro. But I may be misjudging the situation as a bystander of this discussion. Furthermore, there is no such thing as "a signal" on Windows (outside of Cygwin), let alone a SIGCHLD. Therefore, this topic about SA_RESTART is irrelevant for the MinGW port. That said, we have a very stupid emulation of SIGALRM, but it doesn't work like a POSIX signal in any way (if it works at all). -- Hannes