From: Imre Simon <imres.g@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>, Ray Heasman <lists@mythral.org>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Imre Simon <is@ime.usp.br>
Subject: Re: Hash collision count
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:24:14 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68ff9fa6050424142416fbadcd@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <426AEBAE.1060402@pobox.com>
On 4/23/05, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> wrote:
> Petr Baudis wrote:
> > -DCOLLISION_CHECK
>
> Cool. I am happy, then :)
>
> Make sure that's enabled by default...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeff
I would like to second the suggestion that this should be enabled by default.
First, I do think it is highly unlikely that a collision will ever be
found. Actually because of this if one is found it would be an
important byproduct of git and it would probably influence future
system designs. Hence, I believe that it is worth loosing some
efficiency in order to illuminate better this question of the
collision.
I would like to add a reciepe by which one would surely produce a
collision with two files of the same length and quite similar to each
other. I believe that there is a popular belief that this is pretty
much impossible. Of course, we do not have time to execute this
algorithm, but I believe that it convinces everyone that similar files
*do* exist (actually in abundance) with the same hash.
1. Take your favorite text file, at least 160 characters long.
2. Choose 160 positions in this file.
3. For each position choose your favorite mispelling of that character.
4. Produce all 2^160 text files, all of the same length, choosing for
each position either the original or the alternate character
5. Add an arbitrary file of the same length, different from the above
Two of these files have the same sha1 hash. Or, for that matter, for
any 160 bit hash the same is true.
Cheers, Imre Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-24 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-23 20:27 Hash collision count Jeff Garzik
2005-04-23 20:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-04-23 23:00 ` Ray Heasman
2005-04-23 23:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-04-23 23:46 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-24 0:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-04-24 0:40 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-24 0:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-04-24 21:24 ` Imre Simon [this message]
2005-04-24 22:25 ` Whales falling on houses - was: " Jon Seymour
2005-04-25 23:50 ` Tom Lord
2005-04-26 0:00 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-24 1:01 ` Ray Heasman
2005-04-24 7:56 ` David Lang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-24 23:16 linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=68ff9fa6050424142416fbadcd@mail.gmail.com \
--to=imres.g@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=is@ime.usp.br \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=lists@mythral.org \
--cc=pasky@ucw.cz \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).