From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700FEC4724C for ; Mon, 4 May 2020 19:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52531206C0 for ; Mon, 4 May 2020 19:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="XQ7GhorD" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726441AbgEDTC6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2020 15:02:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38608 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725981AbgEDTC5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2020 15:02:57 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com (mail-qt1-x836.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9805DC061A0E for ; Mon, 4 May 2020 12:02:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id s30so475967qth.2 for ; Mon, 04 May 2020 12:02:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=13772MH02HBiJSPNNdzOYdoFwODAJ29IwEkMpJEFyvE=; b=XQ7GhorDkZujAFPv5lCwue6ptU+r1kAK4JCzoTUTLhJ/mI6XRj6XBYAKy2tYCKrMQI 9EIqs6gxDchulqFJHIfe6mREur9gS9ea3DB8rWX58GrSM9Q3tnOD10YENAESHXzn+0ij 8BRiFkvyAoFbWVViAbA4qYp95xOU7bYkWWQl94sFcY6RD6B9yvPMeJG40kucwf7I9WCz ajypU5DWGCARu9vCnRxVz+6TniuBHydp3BuVDKcKku0PiFGsJ3R9WogCX/FEsbV6z2G/ mLYSlzTLj6prtEkwzJSEop//DB7ZHl+CHdF3Mlv707YTfyWUs3wS/iTB6+HgDo5nd2AS Bzvw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=13772MH02HBiJSPNNdzOYdoFwODAJ29IwEkMpJEFyvE=; b=CIQws6kt6XY6GyEksXG/bUn0qM3PJCeFzqSp5h3LE3eZ+hWkUhTLJtnpqh0ulBNDQQ CushkmGUIRj3wGqyNe1gLUhg4xe3l4LY6Rda9uizgeCbTruDaB9TYhh/qalYB1rp/Vsm +oIdrP6qytX9U9Am/25SPkG6NZHNboKDw75CXlDBJbSMhGInB3FpwC+DwMlIHG4SsH+a ozTc8pwPiwf8KW0ohQt58NdvnLtt5ZjWMC9xBthkjCw4TRbWFQGsZokYnTQTkeXjxx55 rV/n16y11WZa9Ds/dq18URf/g2MO1OPfrQla8HQn3o3ZQJloxaZR4lh6olCrizOgbw+A K9IQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaRXIhWNZLTAv/BXzNzC7IGESCAo9GXfB+1zYFEAbN4oI1rR9Yr SevR0bOs9wGMT9yQS2vEIbd5G7mg X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLrbOK7PB+981SigMHPYHEZxrlypnKxbHoJOuDt4UDBFt3csvMA3D4qQzaaeqq6bF6ya7AwBQ== X-Received: by 2002:aed:233d:: with SMTP id h58mr677776qtc.4.1588618976784; Mon, 04 May 2020 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from LeoBras (179-125-207-129.dynamic.desktop.com.br. [179.125.207.129]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s74sm4218570qka.54.2020.05.04.12.02.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 04 May 2020 12:02:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6abf695198e969898c56669bd884f2679aebd35a.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] send-email: Defines smtpPassCmd config option From: Leonardo Bras To: Carlo Marcelo Arenas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bel=F3n?= Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jan Viktorin , Michal Nazarewicz Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 16:02:45 -0300 In-Reply-To: <20200501125308.GE33264@Carlos-MBP> References: <20200501105131.297457-1-leobras.c@gmail.com> <20200501125308.GE33264@Carlos-MBP> Organization: IBM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 (3.34.4-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2020-05-01 at 05:53 -0700, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón wrote: > having said that, this looks like a good alternative, but might need to > make sure if die makes sense below or would be better to see if you can > still get a password through git credential even if that fails. Thank you.