Re: how to trace the patch?

[Aubrey <aubreylee@gmail.com>]

Thanks a lot.
I'll enjoy it.

Regards,
-Aubrey

On 4/27/06, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, sean wrote:
> >
> > $ git log -- <filename>
> >
> > To see a list of commits that affected the file you're interested in.
> >
> > $ git log -p -- <filename>
> >
> > Will include a diff after each commit showing you how the file was
> > changed.  And if you want to see what other changes happened in each
> > commit that modified your file, add "--full-diff" to the command above.
>
> Side note: the "git log -p" thing only works with git 1.3.0+, and even
> without the "-p", old versions will be very slow.
>
> So if you have anything older than 1.3.0, you're likely better off using
> "git whatchanged [-p] -- <filename>".
>
> Also, regardless of which one you use, it's worth pointing out that:
>
>  - for tracking multiple files, just use more than one filename, and you
>   can also use a directory name.
>
>  - you can combine this with all the normal revision limiting rules, which
>   is often useful when you know you're not interested in stuff you've
>   already seen.
>
> For example, if you have just done a "git pull" and you noticed that a
> file (or set of files) you cared about changed - or you just wonder _if_
> it changed - you can do something like
>
>        gitk ORIG_HEAD.. -- drivers/scsi/ include/scsi/
>
> to see what changed due to the pull within those files. Useful whether
> you're tracking certain subsystems, individual drivers, architectures,
> whatever.. It can be useful also just to split the logs up (ie maybe
> you're not interested in anything in particular, but you do a "git log"
> and see something that strikes your fancy, you can decide to see what
> _else_ changed in that area).
>
> And instead of "gitk", use "git log -p" or "git whatchanged" or whatever.
> It's all the same thing, just different ways of looking at it.
>
>                Linus
>