From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66E9F28E2 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 08:21:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b="QNEIKkH0" Received: from mail.manjaro.org (mail.manjaro.org [116.203.91.91]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FEB7BD for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 00:21:25 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1699345282; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+GSfnNvPfPn5JeVkJP6NXlnZg4rhJwrvhrk0Hjdrsug=; b=QNEIKkH0DD9Iw+bGQ7b5Ie94+83Ocrm7jeNCHvZuLibJl1QQdIK8iJzE8Lm/NKSsenGgV9 WS0m0n8cwtEuZ+iZ+mp+67xTczg0O0iZe69erYMXOQQSUEPCIyk/FR+7lb+3jPG0lOKzgN z6MhNMgjvVUbRuwrFxr9DYejtHKZ3ttRVktm09ImyO5qR84SQeEMarMI9j4dfM1RD5Kdkd Q8+PvTySxVasxi8bbIWwaZk3ys098uTh1AxJkMX+XsxikL3jIJmRQXSpHamGXqkbsRa7sr FqqZdaazYhc08cFsZwlnpVnh29BXBIPFmmfcqJPAlC984XH71LCg8NUZZ/AIkw== Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2023 09:21:22 +0100 From: Dragan Simic To: Elijah Newren Cc: Sandra Snan , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: first-class conflicts? In-Reply-To: References: <87cywmintp.fsf@ellen.idiomdrottning.org> Message-ID: <6f15723ef86a40e939b98b731cd8026e@manjaro.org> X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org On 2023-11-07 09:16, Elijah Newren wrote: > But we'd also have to be careful and think through usecases, including > in the surrounding community. People would probably want to ensure > that e.g. "Protected" or "Integration" branches don't get accept > fetches or pushes of conflicted commits, git status would probably > need some special warnings or notices, git checkout would probably > benefit from additional warnings/notices checks for those cases, git > log should probably display conflicted commits differently, we'd need > to add special handling for higher order conflicts (e.g. a merge with > conflicts is itself involved in a merge) probably similar to what jj > has done, and audit a lot of other code paths to see what would be > needed. That would be a truly _massive_ project.