Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org>
To: "Tomas Carnecky" <tom@dbservice.com>, "nn6eumtr" <nn6eumtr@gmail.com>
Cc: "Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How to deal with historic tar-balls
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 20:54:35 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <70916F7E9F934AD3A0DB00C8D6DB6751@PhilipOakley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: B375E525C4704EA8807B5A59257B690B@PhilipOakley

From: "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2012 
6:30 PM
> From: "Tomas Carnecky" <tom@dbservice.com> Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2012
> 12:27 AM
>>On 12/31/11 8:04 PM, nn6eumtr wrote:
>>> I have a number of older projects that I want to bring into a git
>>> repository. They predate a lot of the popular scm systems, so they are
>>> primarily a collection of tarballs today.
> I'm doing a similar thing with a set of zip files. I grouped mine into
> batches for easier checking and putting on to separate branches. Planning
> your branch requirements is probably the biggest task, and will depend on
> how you hope to use the new repo.
>
<snip>
>> There is a script which will import sources from multiple tarballs,
>> creating a commit with the contents of each tarball. It's in the git
>> repository under contrib/fast-import/import-tars.perl.
> I wasn't aware of those scripts. I'll be having a look at the zip import
> script for my needs.

Is there a mechanism for either having fast-import respect a .gitignore,
or determining if a given file/path should be ignored?
My zips contain a lot of compile by-products that should be excluded from 
the repo.

> My extra problem is that almost all my zips have an extra top level
> directory that changes its name for every zip (but some don't..). The TLD
> changes confuses the git rename detection if I don't remove them before
> committing. Fortunately it's an internal development project with no 
> formal
> releases so creating the history is a bit of a personal project which
> doesn't affect ongoing development (which is the crunch question for
> fidelity of the repo you create).
>
>> tom
> Philip

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-01 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-31 19:04 How to deal with historic tar-balls nn6eumtr
2012-01-01  0:27 ` Tomas Carnecky
2012-01-01 18:30   ` Philip Oakley
2012-01-01 20:54     ` Philip Oakley [this message]
2012-01-02 10:07     ` Philip Oakley
2012-01-02 18:26       ` Dirk Süsserott
2012-01-04 20:04         ` Philip Oakley
2012-01-01 19:04   ` Dirk Süsserott
2012-01-05 15:25 ` Neal Kreitzinger
2012-01-07  1:10   ` nn6eumtr
2012-01-07  1:50     ` Thomas Rast
2012-01-07 19:18     ` Neal Kreitzinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=70916F7E9F934AD3A0DB00C8D6DB6751@PhilipOakley \
    --to=philipoakley@iee.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nn6eumtr@gmail.com \
    --cc=tom@dbservice.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox