git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* need help with git show :1:...
@ 2009-04-08 17:41 layer
  2009-04-08 17:58 ` Elijah Newren
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: layer @ 2009-04-08 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: git

I remember this working for me in the not too distant past.  
I'm using git version 1.6.1.3.  Perhaps it was an older version of git
when it worked for me.

quadra% ls -l src/c/sock.c
-rw-r--r-- 1 layer fi 57909 Mar  9 13:32 src/c/sock.c
quadra% git show :2:src/c/sock.c
fatal: ambiguous argument ':2:src/c/sock.c': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions
quadra% git show :1:c/sock.c
fatal: ambiguous argument ':1:c/sock.c': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions
quadra% git show :1:sock.c
fatal: ambiguous argument ':1:sock.c': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions
quadra% git show :1:/src/c/sock.c
fatal: ambiguous argument ':1:/src/c/sock.c': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions




If I cd to "src/c" and do "git show :1:sock.c" the same thing happens.

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: need help with git show :1:...
@ 2009-04-08 17:57 layer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: layer @ 2009-04-08 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: git

I didn't make it clear, but I am in the process of resolve conflicts
from a merge in the repo where those commands were executed.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: need help with git show :1:...
  2009-04-08 17:41 layer
@ 2009-04-08 17:58 ` Elijah Newren
  2009-04-08 18:02   ` layer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Elijah Newren @ 2009-04-08 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: layer; +Cc: git

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:41 AM, layer <layer@known.net> wrote:
> I remember this working for me in the not too distant past.
> I'm using git version 1.6.1.3.  Perhaps it was an older version of git
> when it worked for me.
>
> quadra% ls -l src/c/sock.c
> -rw-r--r-- 1 layer fi 57909 Mar  9 13:32 src/c/sock.c
> quadra% git show :2:src/c/sock.c
> fatal: ambiguous argument ':2:src/c/sock.c': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
> Use '--' to separate paths from revisions
> quadra% git show :1:c/sock.c
> fatal: ambiguous argument ':1:c/sock.c': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
> Use '--' to separate paths from revisions
> quadra% git show :1:sock.c
> fatal: ambiguous argument ':1:sock.c': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
> Use '--' to separate paths from revisions
> quadra% git show :1:/src/c/sock.c
> fatal: ambiguous argument ':1:/src/c/sock.c': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
> Use '--' to separate paths from revisions

Does the file have conflicts?  Try
  $ git ls-files -s src/c/sock.c
and report what the output is.

If it doesn't have conflicts, but the file is tracked by git, using
stage 0 should work:
  $ git show :0:src/c/sock.c

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: need help with git show :1:...
  2009-04-08 17:58 ` Elijah Newren
@ 2009-04-08 18:02   ` layer
  2009-04-08 18:07     ` Elijah Newren
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: layer @ 2009-04-08 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Elijah Newren; +Cc: git

Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Does the file have conflicts?  Try
>> git ls-files -s src/c/sock.c

Yes, it did have conflicts.  I resolved the conflicts via editing, but
want to look at the other versions before finalizing the edits.

quadra% git ls-files -s src/c/sock.c
100644 ef6c9b94c678dc79760edfd15a0796b3726b76f6 0	src/c/sock.c
quadra% 

Elijah, thanks for replying.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: need help with git show :1:...
  2009-04-08 18:02   ` layer
@ 2009-04-08 18:07     ` Elijah Newren
  2009-04-08 18:10       ` layer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Elijah Newren @ 2009-04-08 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: layer; +Cc: git

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:02 PM, layer <layer@known.net> wrote:
> Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Does the file have conflicts?  Try
>>> git ls-files -s src/c/sock.c
>
> Yes, it did have conflicts.  I resolved the conflicts via editing, but
> want to look at the other versions before finalizing the edits.
>
> quadra% git ls-files -s src/c/sock.c
> 100644 ef6c9b94c678dc79760edfd15a0796b3726b76f6 0       src/c/sock.c

That suggests that the file is not unmerged, i.e. that there aren't
any remaining conflicts.  This explains why your commands wouldn't
work unless you used stage 0 instead of 1 or 2.  Now, why there
weren't conflicts when you thought there were?  I have no idea, unless
perhaps you did a stray git add src/c/sock.c.

Hope that helps,
Elijah

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: need help with git show :1:...
  2009-04-08 18:07     ` Elijah Newren
@ 2009-04-08 18:10       ` layer
  2009-04-08 18:25         ` Elijah Newren
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: layer @ 2009-04-08 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Elijah Newren; +Cc: git

Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Hi,
>> 
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:02 PM, layer <layer@known.net> wrote:
>> > Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> Does the file have conflicts?  Try
>> >>> git ls-files -s src/c/sock.c
>> >
>> > Yes, it did have conflicts.  I resolved the conflicts via editing, but
>> > want to look at the other versions before finalizing the edits.
>> >
>> > quadra% git ls-files -s src/c/sock.c
>> > 100644 ef6c9b94c678dc79760edfd15a0796b3726b76f6 0       src/c/sock.c
>> 
>> That suggests that the file is not unmerged, i.e. that there aren't
>> any remaining conflicts.  This explains why your commands wouldn't
>> work unless you used stage 0 instead of 1 or 2.  Now, why there
>> weren't conflicts when you thought there were?  I have no idea, unless
>> perhaps you did a stray git add src/c/sock.c.

It was several of weeks ago that I started this merge, and I remember
playing with git show then and it worki.  I might have overwriten
the file with one of the show's and done manual editing that way.  I
don't know if this makes a difference.

How can I redo the merge for just this file?  Is that possible?  I
think I'd definitely like to start over on *just this one file*.

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: need help with git show :1:...
  2009-04-08 18:10       ` layer
@ 2009-04-08 18:25         ` Elijah Newren
  2009-04-08 18:35           ` layer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Elijah Newren @ 2009-04-08 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: layer; +Cc: git

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:10 PM, layer <layer@known.net> wrote:
> Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:02 PM, layer <layer@known.net> wrote:
>>> > quadra% git ls-files -s src/c/sock.c
>>> > 100644 ef6c9b94c678dc79760edfd15a0796b3726b76f6 0       src/c/sock.c
>>>
>>> That suggests that the file is not unmerged, i.e. that there aren't
>>> any remaining conflicts.  This explains why your commands wouldn't
>>> work unless you used stage 0 instead of 1 or 2.  Now, why there
>>> weren't conflicts when you thought there were?  I have no idea, unless
>>> perhaps you did a stray git add src/c/sock.c.
>
> It was several of weeks ago that I started this merge, and I remember
> playing with git show then and it worki.  I might have overwriten
> the file with one of the show's and done manual editing that way.  I
> don't know if this makes a difference.
>
> How can I redo the merge for just this file?  Is that possible?  I
> think I'd definitely like to start over on *just this one file*.

Well, someone else probably knows a clever way to do this.  I don't,
but the following may help:

MERGE_REF=$(cat .git/MERGE_HEAD)
git show HEAD:src/c/sock.c > current-sock
git show $MERGE_REF:src/c/sock.c > other-sock
git show $(git merge-base $MERGE_REF HEAD):src/c/sock.c > base-sock
git merge-file current-sock other-sock base-sock

That'll redo the three way merge on src/c/sock.c (assuming no renames
or other special cases happened) and store the result in current-sock.
 You can then edit that file and when ready, move the result over
src/c/sock.c.

Elijah

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: need help with git show :1:...
  2009-04-08 18:25         ` Elijah Newren
@ 2009-04-08 18:35           ` layer
  2009-04-08 18:38             ` Elijah Newren
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: layer @ 2009-04-08 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Elijah Newren; +Cc: git

Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> wrote:

>> > How can I redo the merge for just this file?  Is that possible?  I
>> > think I'd definitely like to start over on *just this one file*.
>> 
>> Well, someone else probably knows a clever way to do this.  I don't,
>> but the following may help:
>> 
>> MERGE_REF=$(cat .git/MERGE_HEAD)
>> git show HEAD:src/c/sock.c > current-sock
>> git show $MERGE_REF:src/c/sock.c > other-sock
>> git show $(git merge-base $MERGE_REF HEAD):src/c/sock.c > base-sock
>> git merge-file current-sock other-sock base-sock

Did you mean this?

  git merge-file current-sock base-sock other-sock

The man page seems to indicate that.

>> That'll redo the three way merge on src/c/sock.c (assuming no renames
>> or other special cases happened) and store the result in current-sock.
>>  You can then edit that file and when ready, move the result over
>> src/c/sock.c.

Thanks.  This is a big help.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: need help with git show :1:...
  2009-04-08 18:35           ` layer
@ 2009-04-08 18:38             ` Elijah Newren
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Elijah Newren @ 2009-04-08 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: layer; +Cc: git

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:35 PM, layer <layer@known.net> wrote:
<snip>
>>> git merge-file current-sock other-sock base-sock
>
> Did you mean this?
>
>  git merge-file current-sock base-sock other-sock
>
> The man page seems to indicate that.

Oops, yeah, current then base then other, like the manpage says.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-08 18:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-08 17:57 need help with git show :1: layer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-04-08 17:41 layer
2009-04-08 17:58 ` Elijah Newren
2009-04-08 18:02   ` layer
2009-04-08 18:07     ` Elijah Newren
2009-04-08 18:10       ` layer
2009-04-08 18:25         ` Elijah Newren
2009-04-08 18:35           ` layer
2009-04-08 18:38             ` Elijah Newren

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).