From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Subject: Re: git guidance Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 00:16:27 -0500 Message-ID: <7135.1197090987@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: <20071129105220.v40i22q4gw4cgoso@intranet.digizenstudio.com> <200712072204.48410.a1426z@gawab.com> <11272.1197056185@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <200712080756.21980.a1426z@gawab.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1197090987_2992P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jakub Narebski , Andreas Ericsson , Johannes Schindelin , Phillip Susi , Linus Torvalds , Jing Xue , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, git@vger.kernel.org To: Al Boldi X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Dec 08 06:17:03 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J0s3h-0000km-Jy for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 06:17:02 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752098AbXLHFQj (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2007 00:16:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751998AbXLHFQj (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2007 00:16:39 -0500 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:42417 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751908AbXLHFQi (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2007 00:16:38 -0500 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu (turing-police.cc.vt.edu [127.0.0.1]) by turing-police.cc.vt.edu (8.14.2.Alpha0/8.14.2.Alpha0) with ESMTP id lB85GR1B007137; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 00:16:27 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 08 Dec 2007 07:56:21 +0300." <200712080756.21980.a1426z@gawab.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --==_Exmh_1197090987_2992P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 07:56:21 +0300, Al Boldi said: > It probably goes without saying, that gitfs should have some basic > configuration file to setup its transparent behaviour But then it's not *truly* transparent, is it? And that leaves another question - if you make a config file that excludes all the .o files - then what's backing the .o files? Those data blocks need to be *someplace*. Maybe you can do something ugly like use unionfs to combine your gitfs with something else to store the other files... But at that point, you're probably better off just creating a properly designed versioning filesystem. --==_Exmh_1197090987_2992P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFHWiircC3lWbTT17ARAiEqAJ9+8RurRYI6jjSiX/BaqiNZGJ97AACfTOAw g5Y8Lh36QWvSod8+Zbh9d9E= =DvZ0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1197090987_2992P--