From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Watson Subject: uncommon shell code Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:32:43 +0100 Message-ID: <72499e3b05092207326abadd91@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Robert Watson Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 22 16:37:05 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EIS81-0003ee-5q for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:32:49 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030363AbVIVOcq (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:32:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030370AbVIVOcq (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:32:46 -0400 Received: from qproxy.gmail.com ([72.14.204.198]:12889 "EHLO qproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030363AbVIVOcq convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:32:46 -0400 Received: by qproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v40so58170qbe for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:32:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=gqPgKnOiY5fscq+iScAZ5ySa6m+1/wk1/zCmkA04ycTw+Kwe4ULXPliPlGTrcNIbtStjDbj3CoodR66t6abKR7fCJn50LrQDufeaP0m/pXezUr+RwH6TlsQBTDNSEJbBno0k/fqGc4LUxxhd8V/nPk6LKHsm8JWnz6t7Y8Zy0qI= Received: by 10.64.195.14 with SMTP id s14mr167339qbf; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.203.14 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:32:43 -0700 (PDT) To: git@vger.kernel.org Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, I found the following shell code in git-tag.sh (and others): while case "$#" in 0) break ;; esac do ... done Why not use the straight forward code: while test "$#" -ne 0 do ... done Are there any functional difference between them? Robertoo