From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jay Soffian" Subject: Re: rm and mv commands: should I use them? Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:05:34 -0500 Message-ID: <76718490801061905k30c1ac86r51a65165d47807d4@mail.gmail.com> References: <379EDA94-A67B-483A-BC5F-E961DD52AD0C@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Jon Hancock" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jan 07 04:06:14 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JBiJS-0002gv-V9 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 04:06:07 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752988AbYAGDFh (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:05:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752416AbYAGDFh (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:05:37 -0500 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.180]:5307 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752190AbYAGDFg (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:05:36 -0500 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so12225152wah.23 for ; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:05:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=pRCqEvSbhutW4iBOkez0OWTFAbskafMlp2LEc3JCpL0=; b=Jtp0r7mn8PcwzjwAP5VU5bApcgUVfNSsqli51N7FGTfZjo9NwvvyE9iVCIH1MHofeDYyaQNKfmZ5qqhotMB6pAaBvyJf/noAAXoqDRv1ZCnl8AbcBNwejHp30PqYp73504egy4oIcJ+XIqgwxRg396vsG0uvkwqLbpBDRWzx0RQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oWtW252/zfM7pILLXjIOtUNE6GublaNyNq6BjWy7a2hHd/0f8RMeQGcxOo/zfLcPnEDt8PFIEM/sTuGXYczwySnaHEwcf4tJ67oIBglLbYiR0RIkp0k8eAEnfinWEOKy5Di+jmP36zg5k8XyabwAqiYtYEgjEjtHkIo7NY7uWBg= Received: by 10.114.125.2 with SMTP id x2mr3181358wac.119.1199675134821; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:05:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.22.18 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 19:05:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <379EDA94-A67B-483A-BC5F-E961DD52AD0C@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 1/6/08, Jon Hancock wrote: > Additionally, is there > a simple procedure with git to say: "I want to version exactly what is > in my working tree. If I removed something or added something, just > handle it". >>From http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~blynn/gitmagic/ch05.html#id2553633 is the helpful hint: $ git-ls-files -d -m -o -z | xargs -0 git-update-index --add --remove I've got the following aliases in my .gitconfig: alias.addremove=!git-ls-files -d -m -o -z -X .git/info/exclude -X $(git-config core.excludesfile) --exclude-per-directory=.gitignore | xargs -0 git-update-index --add --remove alias.ls=!git-ls-files -d -m -o -v -X .git/info/exclude -X $(git-config core.excludesfile) --exclude-per-directory=.gitignore (In 1.5.4, you can replace the two -X's and the --exclude-per-directory with --exclude-standard.) j.