git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] builtin-branch: improve output when displaying remote  branches
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:30:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <76718490902112030x46bddd84r561705a6b4f9d4b4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vskmkqpp4.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> $ git branch -rv
>>   origin/HEAD -> master
>>   origin/html           6116912 Autogenerated HTML docs for v1.6.2-rc0-10-gf6b9
>
> Doesn't the misalignment between the above two bother you?

This comment makes me sad. In fact, a previous iteration looked like this:

$ git branch -rv
 origin/HEAD -> master
 origin/html   6116912 Autogenerated HTML docs for v1.6.2-rc0-10-gf6b9
 origin/maint  7e1100e gitweb: add $prevent_xss option to prevent XSS
by repository content
 origin/man    67cb1a7 Autogenerated manpages for v1.6.2-rc0-10-gf6b9
 origin/master f6b98e4 git-web--browse: Fix check for /bin/start
 origin/next   417ce12 Merge branch 'master' into next
 origin/pu     9d798e7 Merge branch 'db/foreign-scm' into pu
 origin/todo   5ed7079 What's in update

IOW, align based on the width of the branch name, completely ignoring
the width of " -> ...". But I found that ugly. It was actually more
work to get it the way it is.

>> diff --git a/builtin-branch.c b/builtin-branch.c
>> index 56a1971..03ad757 100644
>> --- a/builtin-branch.c
>> +++ b/builtin-branch.c
>> @@ -181,7 +181,8 @@ static int delete_branches(int argc, const char **argv, int force, int kinds)
>> +static char *resolve_remote_head_symref(const char *head_name) {
>> +     unsigned char sha1[20];
>> +     int flag;
>> +     const char *refname;
>> +     refname = resolve_ref(head_name, sha1, 0, &flag);
>> +     if (refname && (flag & REF_ISSYMREF) &&
>> +         !prefixcmp(refname, "refs/remotes/"))
>> +             return xstrdup(refname + strlen(head_name) - 4);
>
> Here, head_name is like "refs/remotes/frotz/HEAD", and you are assuming
> that resolved refname begins with "refs/remotes/frotz/" without checking
> the "frotz" part. It may point at "refs/remotes/x/y" in a misconfigured
> repository and your xstrdup() just ran past the end of the string.

Indeed. Now I'm doubly-sad, that my code sucks so bad. :-(

> If the ref you feed to this function turns out not to be a symbolic ref,
> the caller does do the right thing.  It makes wonder if your caller should
> always call this, so that you would still work sensibly even if the tracking
> hierarchy has a funny symref refs/remotes/origin/TAIL that is not HEAD.
>
> The caller is currently this dense code.
>
>> +     newitem->len = strlen(newitem->name);
>> +     newitem->dest = (newitem->kind == REF_REMOTE_BRANCH &&
>> +                      newitem->len > 5 &&
>> +                      !strcmp(newitem->name + newitem->len - 5, "/HEAD"))
>> +                     ? resolve_remote_head_symref(refname - 13) : NULL;
>> +     /* adjust for " -> " */
>> +     if (newitem->dest)
>> +             newitem->len += strlen(newitem->dest) + 4;
>
> It can become something like:
>
>        if (newitem->kind == REF_REMOTE_BRANCH)
>                newitem->dest = resolve_remote_symref(refname - 13);
>        else
>                newitem->dest = NULL;
>        if (newitem->dest)
>                ...
>
> no?

Yes indeed. I'll re-roll to to clean this up, but I'm keeping the
visual output the same unless you really don't like it.

> free(NULL) is Ok; omit the extra check.

Got it. I think I did something similar in the builtin-remote patch I
sent you earlier, so I'll make sure to fix that there too when I
re-roll that one.

Thanks for the review.

j.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-12  4:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-10 11:01 [PATCH] builtin-branch: improve output when displaying remote branches Jay Soffian
2009-02-11  6:47 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-12  3:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-12  4:30   ` Jay Soffian [this message]
2009-02-12  5:42     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-13  5:34       ` [PATCH v2] " Jay Soffian
2009-02-13  6:35         ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-13  6:45           ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-13  7:52             ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-13  8:06               ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-13  9:40                 ` [PATCH v3] " Jay Soffian
2009-02-13  6:47           ` [PATCH v2] " martin f krafft
2009-02-13  7:36             ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-13  7:37         ` Johannes Sixt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=76718490902112030x46bddd84r561705a6b4f9d4b4@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jaysoffian@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).