From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jay Soffian Subject: Re: [PATCH] send-email: handle multiple Cc addresses when reading mbox message Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:42:16 -0500 Message-ID: <76718490902131642y62b81bfat129cfbeda7957ff8@mail.gmail.com> References: <1234566313-36478-1-git-send-email-jaysoffian@gmail.com> <20090214003113.GB7769@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Ryan Anderson , gitster@pobox.com To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Feb 14 01:43:47 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LY8dF-0006ky-Fr for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 01:43:45 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753439AbZBNAmT (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:42:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753413AbZBNAmS (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:42:18 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.234]:48730 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753082AbZBNAmR (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:42:17 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so871108rvb.1 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:42:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cFPWQeguLujafm9w1L4A5sy50gk9P8jXLYNaHXlvfkU=; b=BsrXni+YC6zTc9JNVy+kvAjkD4Z0T6hVOEzDFFNpoMvY/rVorBQWp/sDeqnmqXdR07 kOc9az5QqLLsGGGnW+/3ILUyQv2xiY6fipaZ7G/4dkRhFxO1T2A5mn0C4rN5htKqZ9A1 coYRc2D4PKxRfyd12FHNMESAgoF4cGQaVfhPU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XeRhMOmORvsl4YjcmYbiPU6szaPJiNyupw/Ab43tIAmw6f7ol4tBWvfH8cF6OzfvV9 7sIqfu/egMKFPD4Uradd/ImujKEjH+2jwtzo9fwhvz02qmGUJ8h9cRH/fuywCkHjJaeO bkZED0bWGLi/h4fDx+KwOYyhwowiBwM/aReqY= Received: by 10.141.100.15 with SMTP id c15mr1409333rvm.52.1234572136715; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:42:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090214003113.GB7769@coredump.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Jeff King wrote: > I don't know what the right solution is. I am certainly not volunteering > to rewrite; I am very happy just using my actual MUA to send patches. :) It is quite ugly, and I have thought about rewriting it. But to be quite honest, I have become very discouraged over the last two weeks about submitting patches. What seems at first to be a simple change has required multiple revisions over frankly what feels to me like nit-picking. It goes like this: Me: Notice wart Me: Cut wart off (i.e. submit patch) Reviewer: Sorry, you didn't cut that wart off to my standards, unless you can do it better, I'd rather have the wart. I dunno, maybe I'm too sensitive and don't have the fortitude for contributing to git. Or maybe I'm just venting on a Friday. j.