git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eugene Sajine <euguess@gmail.com>
To: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Cc: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>,
	Jacob Helwig <jacob.helwig@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] - "git commit --amend" commits, when exiting the editor  with no changes written
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:56:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <76c5b8581002021356m52bb1817k9a4a29da0d4b681d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <394FB581-C9B9-40AB-AFB6-39B68ED5BEAD@wincent.com>

>
> As has already been pointed out, an extremely common workflow for "git
> commit --amend" is to include additional changes that were accidentally
> overlooked  in the initial commit, and no changes are made to the commit
> message.
>
> Changing the behavior would break that perfectly reasonable,
> widely-practised workflow, and _that_ would be 100% not ok.

I'm not against that workflow - I'm not forcing anybody to change the
commit message. The thing I'm talking about is roughly that it should
NOT treat the result of command ":q" the same way as the command
":wq".

For example IF there is a variable somewhere where message is stored:
For new commit message it is NULL and when commit is ready it is set
up to "message". We check If it is not empty and not NULL (:wq
executed),  then we can commit.
For "prepopulated" messages this variable can be is set to "message"
from the beginning, so it doesn't matter if you're writing changes or
not the check will always be true, so we can commit.
If the implementation would be like this, then I would propose to
clean up this variable after the prepopulated message is populated, so
it won't use it blindly, but only after you're overwriting the message
(even if the message is not changed).

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-02 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-02 20:07 [BUG] - "git commit --amend" commits, when exiting the editor with no changes written Eugene Sajine
2010-02-02 20:14 ` Jacob Helwig
2010-02-02 20:27   ` Avery Pennarun
2010-02-02 20:47     ` Eugene Sajine
2010-02-02 20:58       ` Wincent Colaiuta
2010-02-02 21:56         ` Eugene Sajine [this message]
2010-02-02 22:03           ` Erik Faye-Lund
2010-02-02 22:06           ` Wincent Colaiuta
2010-02-02 22:31             ` Eugene Sajine
2010-02-02 22:35               ` Avery Pennarun
2010-02-02 23:02                 ` Eugene Sajine
2010-02-02 23:15                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-02-02 23:27                     ` Eugene Sajine
2010-02-02 23:40                   ` Avery Pennarun
2010-02-03  6:15                     ` Larry D'Anna
2010-02-03  9:31                       ` Jeff King
2010-02-03 10:15                         ` Jeff King
2010-02-03 18:19                         ` Avery Pennarun
2010-02-02 23:00               ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-02-02 23:34                 ` Eugene Sajine
2010-02-02 23:40                   ` Erik Faye-Lund
2010-02-02 23:48                     ` Eugene Sajine
2010-02-03  0:16                       ` Erik Faye-Lund
2010-02-03  0:55                         ` Eugene Sajine
2010-02-03  1:59                           ` SZEDER Gábor
2010-02-03  7:34                             ` Matthieu Moy
2010-02-03  9:08                               ` aborting rebase -i right at the start, was " Johannes Schindelin
2010-02-03  9:41                                 ` SZEDER Gábor
2010-02-03 16:02                                   ` Eugene Sajine
2010-02-03  7:31                       ` Matthieu Moy
2010-02-03 15:45                         ` Eugene Sajine
2010-02-03 17:51                           ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-02-03 17:53                             ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-02-03 18:21                           ` Wincent Colaiuta
2010-02-03 18:49                             ` Eugene Sajine
2010-02-03 18:57                               ` Avery Pennarun
2010-02-03 19:27                                 ` Eugene Sajine
2010-02-03 19:54                                   ` Avery Pennarun
2010-02-03 18:47                           ` Matthieu Moy
2010-02-02 23:58                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-02-03  0:09                     ` Eugene Sajine
2010-02-03  9:04                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-02-03  9:46                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-02 23:44                 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-02-02 21:18       ` Avery Pennarun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=76c5b8581002021356m52bb1817k9a4a29da0d4b681d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=euguess@gmail.com \
    --cc=apenwarr@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jacob.helwig@gmail.com \
    --cc=win@wincent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).