Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org>
To: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "GitList" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] Test the Git version string
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 22:26:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <79879228B71A45A48A961F5B1880B61F@PhilipOakley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7v8v4k6hp2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org

From: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 8:22 PM
> Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org> writes:
>
>> This patch series seeks to add tests for the version string format
>> and document it.
>>
>> The key questions to be answered are:
>> * should the test be inside t0000, or somewhere else?
>> * should the version string be limited to one line, <80 characters?
>
> One line, perhaps, but I do not think any byte-limit is reasonable.

OK

>
> It is unreasonable to limit the form to X.Y.Z; after we hit Git 2.0,
> it is likely that we would go to two-decimals.

Ah. And then maintenance releases could be the .Z maybe. I suppose it 
will depend on circumstances.

>
> If the "parsing" is done for white/blacklist purposes, is there a
> need to straight-jacket the verison string format like this series?

The purpose is to document what we felt we could guarantee, and that 
which was open to variation, so that those, like the Git-Gui, can code 
in a sensible check for the version. Two digits (X.Y) should pass the 
existing Git Gui check.

I'll drop the length limit, and keep to an X.Y check

Is the end of t0000-basic.sh a sensible place for the check?

> --
Philip 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-14 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-14 14:27 [RFC/PATCH 0/2] Test the Git version string Philip Oakley
2013-04-14 14:27 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/2] test git " Philip Oakley
2013-04-14 14:27 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/2] Doc: State the exact " Philip Oakley
2013-04-14 19:22 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/2] Test the Git " Junio C Hamano
2013-04-14 21:26   ` Philip Oakley [this message]
2013-04-15  1:39     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-16  7:25       ` Philip Oakley
2013-04-16 18:12         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-16 18:24           ` David Aguilar
2013-04-16 19:02             ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-16 21:22           ` Philip Oakley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=79879228B71A45A48A961F5B1880B61F@PhilipOakley \
    --to=philipoakley@iee.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox