From: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com>
To: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Cc: Git mailing list <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] t3200: verify "branch --list" sanity when rebasing from detached HEAD
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 18:28:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f07a76a-c467-11b9-1d93-233c0892077d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cSrAN2LgL1dAEUoR4PJk-rUzHdqTusXm8MYUn7p6G4puQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2425 bytes --]
On Tuesday 03 April 2018 01:30 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> Note that the "detached HEAD" test case might actually fail in some cases
>> as the actual output of "git branch --list" might contain remote branch
>> names which is not considered by the test case as it is rare to happen
>> in the test environment.
>
> This paragraph was not in the original patch[1]. I _think_ what you
> are saying (which took a while to decipher) is that if a command such
> as "git checkout origin/next" ever gets inserted into the script
> before the test, the test will be fooled since "git branch --list"
> will show "detached HEAD origin/next" rather than "detached HEAD
> d3adb33f", the latter of which is what the test is expecting.
>
Yeah, you're right. To know the reason for the unclear paragraph, see below.
> Unfortunately, this paragraph makes it sound as if the test can fail
> randomly (which, I believe, is not the case), and nobody would want a
> test added which is unreliable, thus this paragraph is not helping to
> sell this patch (in fact, it's actively hurting it). Ideally, the test
> should be entirely deterministic so that it can't be fooled like this.
> Rather than including this (harmful) paragraph in the commit message,
> let's ensure that the test is deterministic (see below).
>
Sorry for the harmful and not so clear paragraph! I actually kept that
paragraph there to **remind me** that I have to fix the issue which it
describes before sending out the patch but I somehow forgot about it
after I added it initially :-(
>> diff --git a/t/t3200-branch.sh b/t/t3200-branch.sh
>> @@ -1246,6 +1247,29 @@ test_expect_success '--merged is incompatible with --no-merged' '
>> +test_expect_success '--list during rebase from detached HEAD' '
>> + test_when_finished "reset_rebase && git checkout master" &&
>> + git checkout HEAD^0 &&
>
> This is the line which I think is causing concern for you. If someone
> inserted a new test before this one which invoked "git checkout
> origin/next" (or something), then even after "git checkout HEAD^0",
> "git branch --list" would still report the unexpected "detached HEAD
> origin/next". Let's fix this, and make the test deterministic, by
> doing this instead:
>
> git checkout master^0 &&
>
Nice idea, will re-send a v3 with this fix and the harmful paragraph
removed.
Thanks,
Kaartic
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-03 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-24 18:38 [PATCH] branch -l: print useful info whilst rebasing a non-local branch Kaartic Sivaraam
2018-03-25 1:34 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-03-25 3:41 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2018-03-25 4:10 ` Jeff King
2018-03-25 4:13 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-03-25 4:28 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-03-25 4:33 ` Jeff King
2018-03-25 6:54 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2018-03-25 7:15 ` Jacob Keller
2018-03-26 7:25 ` Jeff King
2018-03-26 7:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] t3200: unset core.logallrefupdates when testing reflog creation Jeff King
2018-03-26 7:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] t: switch "branch -l" to "branch --create-reflog" Jeff King
2018-03-26 7:28 ` [PATCH 3/5] branch: deprecate "-l" option Jeff King
2018-03-26 7:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] branch: drop deprecated " Jeff King
2018-03-26 7:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] branch: make "-l" a synonym for "--list" Jeff King
2018-03-26 7:44 ` [PATCH] branch -l: print useful info whilst rebasing a non-local branch Eric Sunshine
2018-03-26 18:38 ` Jacob Keller
2018-03-25 17:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-25 5:48 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-03-25 7:36 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2018-04-03 4:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] branch --list: print useful info whilst interactive rebasing a detached HEAD Kaartic Sivaraam
2018-04-03 4:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] t3200: verify "branch --list" sanity when rebasing from " Kaartic Sivaraam
2018-04-03 8:00 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-04-03 12:58 ` Kaartic Sivaraam [this message]
2018-04-03 14:47 ` [PATCH v3 " Kaartic Sivaraam
2018-04-04 8:09 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-04-03 5:02 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] branch --list: print useful info whilst interactive rebasing a " Kaartic Sivaraam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7f07a76a-c467-11b9-1d93-233c0892077d@gmail.com \
--to=kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).