From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/15] user-manual: Update for receive.denyCurrentBranch=refuse Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:36:19 -0800 Message-ID: <7v1ucnssnw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vzjzexv8l.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vd2w7uajk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20130210214621.GA8000@odin.tremily.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Cc: Git To: "W. Trevor King" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 10 23:36:53 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U4fVx-00027x-S2 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 23:36:50 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756856Ab3BJWg1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:36:27 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:59048 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756748Ab3BJWg0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:36:26 -0500 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02548C027; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:36:26 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=gXmuLhdKRMW8KHuYrZU+GgHqLXg=; b=XNvNKd j6eQ+5JSCnPijSi1vBxDYmwPC1hhQNN4qtbszLIw4aeXEFm8uc16YJ/VzftyLOvL /tl/iH0WUQhBO7mBpgAgFcj6mTYWG3TSX5/9fhpJuC9l0ewufM3LcOcbgbIHCsH/ QFPda38Pr6jHOBwHrl53NEUlq4wSfkzcklwsk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=MrHrJclnNpQnDZrP1xYALlzSzZvtqJHL cSNz034pZOWUuQpZOk1rwKCb+jLUjAcAjL047FuvNKuYeC0waH1TOq51/vx79sV3 xC+E8YEiojbjUn4WSkPgvkbbDjPeKF/MeNRJkUUg6Wg8kGzulAG7UR/+g/ln4H3K ZEnqNnQh/mg= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B24C020; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:36:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [98.234.214.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4E8BC012; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:36:23 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20130210214621.GA8000@odin.tremily.us> (W. Trevor King's message of "Sun, 10 Feb 2013 16:46:21 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4D2B99BE-73D2-11E2-8069-BCD12E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "W. Trevor King" writes: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 01:24:47PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> I would not be surprised if some readers felt as if "then why not >> update it instead of rejecting?" were a valid question, without a >> bit more explanation. >> >> You can also push to a repository that has a working tree, >> … > > Looks good to me :). Shall I just drop this patch from v3 and leave > it to you? No. Others need to object to, comment on and polish what you saw from me, before it turns into a commit. And you need to be credited for identifying the problem, initiating the discussion, and collecting responses to result in the final patch.