git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] git-p4: test script
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 18:22:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v1v3kwpm9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110205225105.GB30963@arf.padd.com> (Pete Wyckoff's message of "Sat\, 5 Feb 2011 17\:51\:05 -0500")

Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com> writes:

> Add a basic test script for git-p4.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
> ---
>  t/t9800-git-p4.sh |   62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100755 t/t9800-git-p4.sh
>
> diff --git a/t/t9800-git-p4.sh b/t/t9800-git-p4.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..f4956b7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/t/t9800-git-p4.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +
> +test_description='git-p4 tests'
> +
> +. ./test-lib.sh
> +
> +p4 -h >/dev/null 2>&1
> +retc=$?
> +p4d -h >/dev/null 2>&1
> +retd=$?
> +if test $retc -ne 0 -o $retd -ne 0
> +then

Use of two global variables with short names makes me feel "yeek!".

	(p4 -h && p4d -h) >/dev/null 2>/dev/null ||
	{
		...
                test_done
	}

> +GITP4=$GIT_BUILD_DIR/contrib/fast-import/git-p4
> +P4DPORT=10669
> +
> +db="$TRASH_DIRECTORY/db"
> +cli="$TRASH_DIRECTORY/cli"
> +git="$TRASH_DIRECTORY/git"
> +
> +test_debug 'echo p4d -q -d -r "$db" -p $P4DPORT'
> +test_expect_success setup '
> +	mkdir -p "$db" &&
> +	p4d -q -d -r "$db" -p $P4DPORT &&
> +	# wait for it to finish its initialization
> +	sleep 1 &&

Is there a guarantee that "1" is sufficiently long for everybody?

Otherwise this will be a flaky test that sometimes passes and sometimes
doesn't, which we try to avoid.

If the answer is "empirically 1 second is sufficient for 99.9% of people",
then I would have to guess that it is 0.8 second too long for majority of
people, in which case I would like to see us try harder to make it both
reliable and efficient.

Isn't there a "noop" command a client can issue against a working server
that fails when the server is not ready (or waits until the server becomes
ready)?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-07  2:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-05 22:48 [PATCH 0/8] git-p4 fixes and enhancements Pete Wyckoff
2011-02-05 22:51 ` [PATCH 1/8] git-p4: test script Pete Wyckoff
2011-02-06 18:00   ` Vitor Antunes
2011-02-07  2:22   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2011-02-07 22:26     ` Pete Wyckoff
2011-02-05 22:51 ` [PATCH 2/8] git-p4: fix key error for p4 problem Pete Wyckoff
2011-02-05 22:51 ` [PATCH 3/8] git-p4: add missing newline in initial import message Pete Wyckoff
2011-02-08  8:48   ` Tor Arvid Lund
2011-02-05 22:52 ` [PATCH 4/8] git-p4: accommodate new move/delete type in p4 Pete Wyckoff
2011-02-08  8:52   ` Tor Arvid Lund
2011-02-05 22:52 ` [PATCH 5/8] git-p4: reinterpret confusing p4 message Pete Wyckoff
2011-02-05 22:52 ` [PATCH 6/8] git-p4: better message for "git-p4 sync" when not cloned Pete Wyckoff
2011-02-08  8:55   ` Tor Arvid Lund
2011-02-05 22:52 ` [PATCH 7/8] git-p4: decode p4 wildcard characters Pete Wyckoff
2011-02-08  9:09   ` Tor Arvid Lund
2011-02-08 23:26     ` Pete Wyckoff
2011-02-05 22:52 ` [PATCH 8/8] git-p4: support clone --bare Pete Wyckoff
2011-02-08  9:18   ` Tor Arvid Lund

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7v1v3kwpm9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pw@padd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).