From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC] submodule+shallow clone feature request Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:09:09 -0800 Message-ID: <7v1vgszo16.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <4B73277C.9010801@columbia.edu> <7vsk983fi4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , Schuyler Duveen , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 11 00:09:29 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NfLgW-0002tR-CV for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:09:28 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755133Ab0BJXJX (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:09:23 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:42510 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753283Ab0BJXJW (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:09:22 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9146298617; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:09:19 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=whZ8Rlp8AwQcu1BfZ2xGqLfEkRI=; b=DDv4+5 W4ICzfW/r3cackBj7YLQeeewybW8xGqB7rEGqkJK2s/19TyBDxQDiVXQ96HJZqWT zPdzp7HP3HyexChkd3FYI5Up+UENIi1XZc0CEjrJqh8VVKGzez2sVE6Kj06OuOq9 fOxB2vDyIlVOtGpT9BtycmH8IvZ2OARYJ4JZs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=k6wXnxjlrsclDXhemNt//4Vbh9MNk8L8 FH5ugOuLUzHy3JFCIW4VOO3P09NaboUswLGl5QJ1whOGuGrFgjhNFxdCMD0/DSOq uISo+WmK79JXKvPLTdOgRc0YqiOzhBE8fpHbC3bBsSdPNcxWAzE4q3JE6lt7PhgS cauGJeJDtYQ= Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582AE98613; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:09:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69B2B9860C; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:09:11 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Wed\, 10 Feb 2010 23\:57\:54 +0100 \(CET\)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4F747D92-1699-11DF-AC58-6AF7ED7EF46B-77302942!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Yes. Note, though, that the problems of enhancing git-submodule are not > technical, as we can learn from the recent history, including the lack of > support for rebasing submodules (there _were_ patches!). Sorry I don't recall. Were they of 'next' quality? How well were they reviewed?