From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6 (v2)] full integration of rev-cache into git's revision walker, completed test suite Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 11:22:00 -0700 Message-ID: <7v1vnk97av.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Nicolas Pitre" , "Johannes Schindelin" , "Sam Vilain" , "Michael J Gruber" , "Jeff King" , "Shawn O. Pearce" , "Andreas Ericsson" , "Christian Couder" , "git\@vger.kernel.org" To: "Nick Edelen" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Aug 09 20:22:29 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MaD2K-0001Qy-Mx for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:22:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752488AbZHISWV (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Aug 2009 14:22:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752374AbZHISWU (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Aug 2009 14:22:20 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:65053 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751227AbZHISWU (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Aug 2009 14:22:20 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F62E23F71; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 14:22:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A08AD23F6E; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 14:22:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Nick Edelen's message of "Sat\, 08 Aug 2009 09\:31\:59 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 936660AC-8511-11DE-A689-AEF1826986A2-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Nick Edelen" writes: > This patch provides a working integration of rev-cache into the revision > walker, along with some touch-ups: This message from me is not about the patch 5/6 at all. It is about your earlier patches in the series. > ... > - printf("queue:\n"); > + fprintf(stderr, "queue:\n"); > ... > - printf("work:\n"); > + fprintf(stderr, "work:\n"); > ... > - printf("pending:\n"); > + fprintf(stderr, "pending:\n"); > ... > - pptr = &item->parents; > + pptr = &item->parents; > ... > -#define SLOP 5 > +#define SLOP 5 > ... These are all "Shoot, the mistakes in earlier ones need to be fixed here" changes. Please fix them in the patch earlier in the series so that you do not have to make, and more importantly, reviewers do not have to get distracted by, these fix-up in a later patch like this.