From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Michał Kiedrowicz" <michal.kiedrowicz@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] builtin-apply: keep information about files to be deleted
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:30:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v1vrwdyxx.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090413230351.7cbb01f5@gmail.com> (Michał Kiedrowicz's message of "Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:03:51 +0200")
Michał Kiedrowicz <michal.kiedrowicz@gmail.com> writes:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> ...
>> But if you have further patches that do the following (the "file
>> table" mechanism was added to handle concatenated patches that affect
>> the same path more than once), I thing PATH_TO_BE_DELETED logic would
>> break down:
>>
>> patch #3 renames alpha.c to hello.c
>> patch #4 renames hello.c to alpha.c
>>
>> When patch #3 is handled, the PATH_TO_BE_DELETED mark is long gone
>> from hello.c, and we will see the same failure you addressed in your
>> patch, won't we?
>
> As far as I understand the code, diffs are applied independently
> (for every file apply_patch() is called) and for every apply_patch()
> call fn_table is cleared. So situation you described in only possible
> in a *single* diff and I don't think it is possible to happen.
Yes, one invocation of "git format-patch -1" will not produce such a
situation.
A single diff file that is concatenation of two "git format-patch -1"
output (or just a plain-old "diff -ru" output from outside git, perhaps
managed in quilt) was what introduced fn_table mechanism. Apparently
people use "git apply" to apply such a patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-13 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-11 19:31 [PATCH] builtin-apply: keep information about files to be deleted Michał Kiedrowicz
2009-04-13 13:51 ` Michał Kiedrowicz
2009-04-13 18:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-13 21:03 ` Michał Kiedrowicz
2009-04-13 21:30 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2009-04-17 17:23 ` Michał Kiedrowicz
2009-04-18 4:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-18 11:27 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-04-18 19:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-18 20:58 ` Michał Kiedrowicz
2009-04-18 21:03 ` [PATCH] tests: make test-apply-criss-cross-rename more robust Michał Kiedrowicz
2009-04-18 22:05 ` [PATCH] builtin-apply: keep information about files to be deleted Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7v1vrwdyxx.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kiedrowicz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).