From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Announce: gitbuilder, an autobuilder for git-based projects Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:29:32 -0700 Message-ID: <7v1w05g8v7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <32541b130808302007r3d570aa8ka221f210251944ba@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Git mailing list" To: "Avery Pennarun" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Aug 31 05:31:29 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KZdez-0000os-4x for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 05:31:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755533AbYHaD3i (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:29:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754961AbYHaD3i (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:29:38 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:63554 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754518AbYHaD3i (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:29:38 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4FB6E173; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:29:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CD3F6E172; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:29:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <32541b130808302007r3d570aa8ka221f210251944ba@mail.gmail.com> (Avery Pennarun's message of "Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:07:17 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 09A457C4-770D-11DD-B7EB-3113EBD4C077-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Avery Pennarun" writes: > I set up the same autobuilder tool for a couple of our projects at > work, which have more interesting output since our developers are > somewhat less careful to make sure the tests pass before committing. > git.git is a bit boring to look at because Junio is apparently so good > at his job. Thanks for the compliments, but it is easy for the integrator to be "so good". I only have to apply patches and if the result or the result of merging that to 'next' does not pass the test, I just reject it to have the original submitter handle the fallouts ;-). It is quite a different story for leaf level developers.