From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] cvsexportcommit: be graceful when "cvs status" reorders the arguments Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:36:59 -0800 Message-ID: <7v1w7ap0vo.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vbq6fvudp.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Martin Langhoff , Robin Rosenberg To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 18 19:38:08 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JRAsP-0004FA-VH for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:38:06 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753026AbYBRSha (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:37:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752826AbYBRSha (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:37:30 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:36420 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751452AbYBRSh3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:37:29 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D618E48C4; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:37:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F2148C2; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:37:16 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: >> The script uses File::Basename upfront so perhaps just simply... > > I tried that. But as the file need not exist, "basename" went on strike. > > So I'll keep the (ugly) version. The reason why "basename" is not being used needs documented in the code then. The next person will likely to make the same mistake as I did.