From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] Use git diff instead of diff in t7201 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:57:50 -0800 Message-ID: <7v1w855ugx.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Barkalow X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 26 00:58:43 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JIYRW-0007HZ-4l for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:58:42 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752913AbYAYX6M (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:58:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752854AbYAYX6L (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:58:11 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:51158 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752823AbYAYX6K (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:58:10 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D02112C; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:58:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C88112B; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:58:02 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Daniel Barkalow's message of "Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:25:07 -0500 (EST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Daniel Barkalow writes: > If the test failed, it was giving really unclear ed script > output. Instead, give a diff that sort of suggests the problem. Hmm. I'd actually prefer using "diff -u" instead.