From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH decompress BUG] Fix decompress_next_from() wrong argument value Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:44:08 -0800 Message-ID: <7v1w8mvq87.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vfxx3290v.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vir1zwlcw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Junio C Hamano" , "Git Mailing List" To: "Marco Costalba" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 12 19:44:59 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JDlLi-0000bB-W5 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:44:55 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753712AbYALSoU (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:44:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753563AbYALSoU (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:44:20 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:36197 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752904AbYALSoT (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:44:19 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A88D4321; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:44:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B600B4320; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:44:12 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Marco Costalba's message of "Sat, 12 Jan 2008 08:42:14 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Marco Costalba" writes: > Do you prefer patches differently organized or I can keep the same > patch contents (of course with squashing the bug fixes in) ? My impression was that the organization was good (addition of the helpers, and then conversion to existing code to use the helper piece-by-piece), even though I admit that I did not look at them very deeply.