From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] binary-tree-based objects. Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:48:19 -0800 Message-ID: <7v1wy9f7q4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <87slqpg11q.fsf@wine.dyndns.org> <7vslqpi9mg.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vhd75fc6y.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 12 06:48:27 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F8A5x-0005Gn-FH for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 06:48:26 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964780AbWBLFsW (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:48:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932274AbWBLFsV (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:48:21 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net ([68.230.241.34]:33939 "EHLO fed1rmmtao05.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932251AbWBLFsV (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:48:21 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060212054554.UHYO17838.fed1rmmtao05.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:45:54 -0500 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:23:10 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> >> If somebody shows that the other approaches are faster, then I guess I'll >> just have to sulk in a corner and grown quietly at people. > > growl. growL. With an 'L'! I do not get it. But my impression was the circular hash with trivial fixes were the fastest. I am benching them now.