From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: How is working on arbitrary remote heads supposed to work in Cogito (+ PATCH)? Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:52:45 -0700 Message-ID: <7v1x5ic1pe.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <200507271458.43063.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> <7vll3rlnqm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200507271458.43063.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> <20050728120806.GA2391@pasky.ji.cz> <20050728153506.GL14229@pasky.ji.cz> <20050728161815.GC17952@pasky.ji.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Josef Weidendorfer , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 28 18:54:50 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyBe2-00054W-5s for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:54:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261750AbVG1Qxf (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:53:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261706AbVG1Qx1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:53:27 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao03.cox.net ([68.230.241.36]:47562 "EHLO fed1rmmtao03.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261724AbVG1Qwx (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:52:53 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050728165242.FKZC17043.fed1rmmtao03.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:52:42 -0400 To: Petr Baudis In-Reply-To: <20050728161815.GC17952@pasky.ji.cz> (Petr Baudis's message of "Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:18:15 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Petr Baudis writes: > AFAIK the plan is to centralize all the kernel repositories to a single > one. For that, developers would generally push into branches with name > different that "master". I did not know about that plan, but that is interesting and now I understand why you think it is important to be able for more than one person to push into a single repository. How will the namespace of N-hundred branches in that repository be managed? To avoid collisions, wouldn't there be some coordination, and there will be branch names there that everybody agrees that they are owned by you? At that point, wouldn't it be easier for _you_ (as one kernel developer who owns such globally unique branch names) to name your branch you intend to push there the same way in your working repository as well?