From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2011, #02; Wed, 4) Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 08:59:53 -0700 Message-ID: <7v39ktb0jq.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vsjstc1pp.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 05 18:00:16 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QI0yK-0006J0-VT for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:00:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755360Ab1EEQAE (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 May 2011 12:00:04 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:40163 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753363Ab1EEQAD (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 May 2011 12:00:03 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07BF50AE; Thu, 5 May 2011 12:02:05 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=lQjPiPgLKSmiaxBeuSyLYhRmVYE=; b=jpCHKr l5wb43LBP8aUrOHOY/O3hwB7v1llFKFWJt6TuFdSGKkq16V5drGDgd/md5Od3BnN K3+BOGEZ1lkn7lw9yq0ZGLohbOruswsxkCHHbmbo6sbiE/3PMDoMFcpfKY/z26Ql TVZTv3T04l8RBz90lS5GRUzWMauCJOdWFHelo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=nrqU0TYhxcgYSfiA9e6/5LiuSPkKg+Ke T82EaUGrugCfRBKB8hAmpbk7bYDIs6gQYevVt+l5X0psMOKUB16OfrPbzX89kq9D 7enpPI+W60zkT5/2nsdS0LuQxweRXGjwPtGOg1MeFKzyqeuLPM6PIWoFkUV+yMGd cgxAJFYz0bo= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDF550AC; Thu, 5 May 2011 12:02:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8ED0750AB; Thu, 5 May 2011 12:01:59 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Jakub Narebski's message of "Thu, 05 May 2011 02:08:32 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 03FBBB10-7731-11E0-89EF-E8AB60295C12-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Narebski writes: >> Rerolled. Waiting for comments. > > Should I extract first two commits i.e. > > - Remove gitweb/gitweb.cgi and other legacy targets from main Makefile > - git-instaweb: Simplify build dependency on gitweb > > into a separate patch series? Even though their existence was > ... > I think this cleanup is worthy on its own. Sounds like a good idea. Thanks. >> * jn/ctags (2011-04-29) 6 commits >> - gitweb: Optional grouping of projects by category >> - gitweb: Modularized git_get_project_description to be more generic >> - gitweb: Split git_project_list_body in two functions >> - gitweb: Mark matched 'ctag' / contents tag (?by_tag=foo) >> - gitweb: Change the way "content tags" ('ctags') are handled >> - gitweb: Restructure projects list generation >> >> Waiting for comments. > > Should I do and post benchmarks for > > - gitweb: Restructure projects list generation > > change (when 'forks' feature is used)? > > Note that "gitweb: Mark matched 'ctag' / contents tag (?by_tag=foo)" > has ACK from Petr Baudis ('pasky'). ... meaning the first three in the series? I missed that. Thanks for a reminder.