From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: file names Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:51:51 -0800 Message-ID: <7v39q6hm14.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git Mailing List To: Thiago Farina X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Dec 09 18:52:08 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PQkf1-00035E-RP for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 18:52:08 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756324Ab0LIRwA (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:52:00 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:56373 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756171Ab0LIRv7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:51:59 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0963886; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:52:22 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=1W/+FTa/qwct+uZkXoIajwI2jNY=; b=n0sF4t rnDT4CHLRAHlXUaC6ksAinJ/Tez2NJYQVjA42eFgeSnILkBSz5ktHOAeOXVr/IcP WVZ3mG+etj+nM2GTd/fF/dA5M1GcAGAYgOtOMw/9fgkzMwEsgo29Czf191ZZMqoS a5Pa0ObVjRc+8J5SA5RGpWep0A76c2IyS3zI4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=oBTv6fRgioJX62iXq5YJr0nsYwrnX0cX 925WEcXgvx295FPx4nSXUU1UPXxyJeLiME+jSmrcwxin89SlDMYf/iPl52/inrfF SrcDWJW9USoymu3JZwcvTPaQhLTQNvq4NrK+CSIwIa/AtVxVXmeDiuU0iacLLCj/ binpWCMLmXo= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2560F3885; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:52:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AA6F3883; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:52:16 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Thiago Farina's message of "Thu\, 9 Dec 2010 15\:05\:33 -0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 11A9884C-03BD-11E0-BE2F-C4BE9B774584-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Thiago Farina writes: > So it seems from this data, there is a preference for naming files > using dash over underline. Yes. > So the question is, should the files using underline be converted to > use dash instead? If this were before v1.0.0, it might have made some sense, but not at this moment. So the answer to "should?" (or "could?") is a firm "no", which is always different from the answer to "wouldn't it have been nicer if they were named differently?" Or just after a large version bump (say 1.8.0), perhaps.