From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
Cc: "Daniel Barkalow" <barkalow@iabervon.org>,
"Thomas Rast" <trast@student.ethz.ch>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] pull/fetch rename
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:33:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v3a5db6ij.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091021063008.GA3349@glandium.org> (Mike Hommey's message of "Wed\, 21 Oct 2009 08\:30\:08 +0200")
Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> writes:
> BTW, shouldn't fetch be deprecated in favour of git remote update ?
Why? People will then be confused because half of them would expect
"remote update" to somehow affect their working tree, and some others
would expect their working tree reset to one of the branches from the
remote, and it won't solve anything. Oh, and it will irritate people who
are used to type "git fetch", too.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-21 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-20 17:47 [RFC] pull/fetch rename Thomas Rast
2009-10-20 19:59 ` Wesley J. Landaker
2009-10-20 21:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-20 22:53 ` Thomas Rast
2009-10-20 23:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-21 2:01 ` Wesley J. Landaker
2009-10-20 23:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-20 21:42 ` Nanako Shiraishi
2009-10-20 22:41 ` Thomas Rast
2009-10-20 23:56 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-10-21 3:06 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-10-21 4:22 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-10-21 11:57 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-10-21 17:12 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-10-21 6:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-21 17:19 ` Clemens Buchacher
2009-10-21 17:21 ` [PATCH] modernize fetch/merge/pull examples Clemens Buchacher
2009-10-21 21:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-21 21:41 ` [RFC/PATCH] git-merge: forbid fast-forward and up-to-date when --no-commit is given Junio C Hamano
2009-10-22 10:21 ` Nanako Shiraishi
2009-10-22 22:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-21 21:46 ` [PATCH] git-merge: imply --no-ff " Junio C Hamano
2009-10-22 6:35 ` Clemens Buchacher
2009-10-22 8:51 ` [PATCH] modernize fetch/merge/pull examples Thomas Rast
2009-10-22 9:48 ` [RFC] pull/fetch rename Thomas Rast
2009-10-21 6:30 ` Mike Hommey
2009-10-21 6:33 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2009-10-21 7:06 ` Mike Hommey
2009-10-21 7:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-21 7:45 ` Jeff King
2009-10-21 7:47 ` Jeff King
2009-10-24 6:30 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7v3a5db6ij.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
--cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mh@glandium.org \
--cc=trast@student.ethz.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).