From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC] pull/fetch rename Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:33:40 -0700 Message-ID: <7v3a5db6ij.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <200910201947.50423.trast@student.ethz.ch> <20091021063008.GA3349@glandium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Daniel Barkalow , Thomas Rast , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn?= Steinbrink To: Mike Hommey X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 21 08:34:01 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N0Ulj-00027r-QB for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:34:00 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752314AbZJUGdu (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:33:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752118AbZJUGdt (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:33:49 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:56994 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752023AbZJUGdt (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:33:49 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B33B7F4E6; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:33:53 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=YsVi6jSjt3r4XJJNdtxYx4Czoyk=; b=NdUH0P tJ8t5IB8p5I+iTeKnoXZRBe546CR2JCusKSg58Mn0S1Z85cEpfwMo+ANFFy6cI/A yFE0HsaTMPGZClE48t+P3OnbwfN6sjxMoDrthhuFD5R/i9i603Z+l2DWnJqxYZZp awVx5sucZvo7Mkzd+wquetDzkhCoxIABouJ1Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=MgXrik68f0k454H1et8lWqgdWYAzLERH nwFJuX4R3gZO/PbYIltlBvUBMqRoI/evlmt/exGW7Om1HS7JsNoCstYx+jPbY32A hMW1Wu2zNWUsFGkK0x+F/ESJyV2V1U0w4KOafJd5yF7cJl1aOxr0bkytI10ROpCu nnxqzSCC6vc= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B597F4E0; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:33:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 806567F4DE; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:33:41 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20091021063008.GA3349@glandium.org> (Mike Hommey's message of "Wed\, 21 Oct 2009 08\:30\:08 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B07138C4-BE0B-11DE-8716-A67CBBB5EC2E-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Mike Hommey writes: > BTW, shouldn't fetch be deprecated in favour of git remote update ? Why? People will then be confused because half of them would expect "remote update" to somehow affect their working tree, and some others would expect their working tree reset to one of the branches from the remote, and it won't solve anything. Oh, and it will irritate people who are used to type "git fetch", too.