From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] parse-options: add PARSE_OPT_LITERAL_ARGHELP for complicated argh's Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 09:26:47 -0700 Message-ID: <7v3aaybewo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1242557224-8411-1-git-send-email-bebarino@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Narebski , Sverre Rabbelier To: Stephen Boyd X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 21 18:27:39 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M7B7J-0006io-Pz for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 21 May 2009 18:27:38 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754470AbZEUQ0s (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2009 12:26:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754444AbZEUQ0r (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2009 12:26:47 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao107.cox.net ([68.230.241.39]:54060 "EHLO fed1rmmtao107.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754330AbZEUQ0r (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2009 12:26:47 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo03.cox.net ([70.169.32.75]) by fed1rmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090521162648.DCMZ18948.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@fed1rmimpo03.cox.net>; Thu, 21 May 2009 12:26:48 -0400 Received: from localhost ([68.225.240.211]) by fed1rmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id uGSn1b00B4aMwMQ04GSntX; Thu, 21 May 2009 12:26:48 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=8iQOWhK3efMA:10 a=9tctSHRPvscA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=gn3GkqqyaaWcKwmkL9AA:9 a=NoSsYfi356zI3FccRepL7YSeK60A:4 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 In-Reply-To: (Stephen Boyd's message of "Thu\, 21 May 2009 00\:33\:17 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Stephen Boyd writes: > I've decided to appease the pirate haters :-) Hmmm, why does this break t0040 (I am queuing this on top of 5acb3e5)?