From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] commit: add function to unparse a commit and its parents
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 23:27:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v3ab3exht.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090517153647.6403.44036.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> (Christian Couder's message of "Sun\, 17 May 2009 17\:36\:45 +0200")
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> writes:
> Its parents are recursively unparsed too, because they might have
> been changed. But its tree is not unparsed as it should not have
> been modifed.
It is a bug in any codepath if it used commit->tree without first checking
if commit->parsed is true to begin with, so you could NULLify commit->tree
but that shouldn't make any difference. I agree leaving the tree object
as-is would make sense.
I am not convinced that unparsing all the _remaining_ parents recursively
like your patch does is enough. Isn't there a codepath that
- parses a commit A to find list of true parents X, Y, Z;
- iterates over that list and descend into one of these parents X, doing
nasty things such as pruning its parents list after parsing it; and
- decides to prune that parent X from the parent list, making the parent
list of A into Y and Z?
After such a sequence, calling your unparse_commit(A) will unparse A and
remaining parents of Y and Z, but will still leave X in the dirty state.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-18 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090517153307.6403.73576.>
2009-05-17 15:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] bisect: rework some rev related functions to make them more reusable Christian Couder
2009-05-17 15:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] commit: add function to unparse a commit and its parents Christian Couder
2009-05-18 6:27 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2009-05-19 4:16 ` Christian Couder
2009-05-19 5:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-05-19 6:35 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-05-19 7:02 ` Miles Bader
2009-05-19 7:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-05-19 7:48 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-05-25 9:17 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-05-25 9:46 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-05-27 5:12 ` Christian Couder
2009-05-17 15:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] bisect: check ancestors without forking a "git rev-list" process Christian Couder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7v3ab3exht.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).