From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] object: add one bit to let creation of private types (OBJ_MAX + n) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:47:55 -0800 Message-ID: <7v3ae5yldg.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vocwuxrgb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 23 02:49:37 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LbPws-0007PU-NM for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:49:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752318AbZBWBsG convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:48:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751771AbZBWBsE (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:48:04 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:62912 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752260AbZBWBsB convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:48:01 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE47B9C5C1; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:48:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41C1B9C5BE; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:47:56 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau's message of "Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:35:05 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 00A3A282-014C-11DE-A15E-B26E209B64D9-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau writes: > One option is to reuse the struct tag, by adding a "light" flag, but = I > am not fond of this idea. > > Second option is to create a custom tag list in builtin-tag.c, not > reusing object_list. I guess this is better then. What do you think? My preference is, as was indicated in my reply to 5/6, the latter.