From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] deny push to current branch of non-bare repo
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:16:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v3ai3f7oa.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081107220730.GA15942@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:07:30 -0500")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> The FAQ even says "don't do this until you know what you are doing." So
> the safety valve is configurable, so that those who know what they are
> doing can switch it off.
"We are breaking your existing working setup but you can add a new
configuration to unbreak it" should not be done lightly. I think as the
end result it is a reasonable thing to aim for for this particular
feature, but we do need a transition plan patch in between that introduces
a step that warns but not forbids. We can ship 1.6.1 with it and then
switch the default to forbid in 1.6.3, for example.
> Patch 4/4 is the interesting one. 1/4 is a cleanup I saw while fixing
> tests. 2/4 is a cleanup to prepare for 3/4. And 3/4 fixes a bunch of
> tests which were inadvertently doing such a push (but didn't care
> because they didn't look at the working directory).
I wonder if you can use the tests 3/4 touches as the test for your "keep
existing setup" configuration variable, pretending that they are old
timer's repositories?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-07 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-07 22:07 [RFC PATCH 0/4] deny push to current branch of non-bare repo Jeff King
2008-11-07 22:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] t5400: expect success for denying deletion Jeff King
2008-11-09 10:38 ` Jan Krüger
2008-11-07 22:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] t5516: refactor oddball tests Jeff King
2008-11-07 22:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] tests: avoid pushing to current branch of non-bare repo Jeff King
2008-11-07 22:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] receive-pack: deny push " Jeff King
2008-11-07 22:39 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] " Mark Burton
2008-11-07 23:16 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-11-08 14:27 ` Jeff King
2008-11-08 15:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-11-08 20:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-09 1:49 ` Jeff King
2008-11-09 22:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-12 0:44 ` Kyle Moffett
2008-11-12 8:44 ` Jeff King
2008-11-13 5:22 ` Kyle Moffett
2008-11-13 5:37 ` Jeff King
2008-11-13 6:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-13 13:58 ` Kyle Moffett
2008-11-14 6:37 ` Jeff King
2008-12-02 2:22 ` Leo Razoumov
2008-12-02 2:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-02 2:41 ` Leo Razoumov
2008-12-02 2:48 ` Jeff King
2008-12-02 3:08 ` Leo Razoumov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7v3ai3f7oa.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sam@vilain.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).