From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC] Stopping those fat "What's cooking in git.git" threads Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:16:45 -0700 Message-ID: <7v3am42lk2.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080720205125.GP10347@genesis.frugalware.org> <7vsku44679.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Junio C Hamano" , "Miklos Vajna" , git@vger.kernel.org To: sverre@rabbelier.nl X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 21 01:17:54 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KKiA5-0005qF-CD for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:17:53 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752933AbYGTXQy (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:16:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752815AbYGTXQx (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:16:53 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:63971 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752155AbYGTXQx (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:16:53 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C644737DA6; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:16:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4464F37DA5; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:16:47 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Sverre Rabbelier's message of "Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:50:40 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EF7B059E-56B1-11DD-A1CC-CE28B26B55AE-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Sverre Rabbelier" writes: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> I could make "What's cooking" not a follow-up to the previous issue, or >> perhaps add "(volume 1.6.0, issue 28)" at the end of the Subject. > > The downside of this is that it'll be less easy to see the difference > with the previous version. My vague recollection is that it was Pasky who complained long time ago when "What's in" was not a follow-up to its previous round, which led me to switch my workflow to send them in the current form. You cannot satisfy certain people no matter what you do.