From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] git-submodule: New subcommand 'summary' (2) - show commit summary Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 20:10:24 -0800 Message-ID: <7v3ar4lcgf.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1204481710-29791-1-git-send-email-pkufranky@gmail.com> <1204481710-29791-2-git-send-email-pkufranky@gmail.com> <7vk5kgiv0v.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <46dff0320803051816x5b957da0m6396d31cad8b4116@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Ping Yin" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 06 05:11:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JX7S2-0006u6-Nl for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 05:11:27 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753401AbYCFEKn (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Mar 2008 23:10:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753166AbYCFEKn (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Mar 2008 23:10:43 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:33549 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752188AbYCFEKm (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Mar 2008 23:10:42 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0BD1C82; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 23:10:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AC11C81; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 23:10:34 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <46dff0320803051816x5b957da0m6396d31cad8b4116@mail.gmail.com> (Ping Yin's message of "Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:16:23 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Ping Yin" writes: > ... I think showing 2 (the head and tail one) should make more sense > since the head one would be "Initial add ..." in many cases which > doesn't make much sense for the user. Why would you want to see the bottom one? I still don't understand. And I do not mean this as a rhetorical question. I am here to learn and I would like to make sure that I do not make a suggestion based on wrong understanding of what the user wants to see. I probably am lacking imagination to think of a good use scenario that showing the bottom one would be useful to the user, and you as the author of this patch must thought about what the user want much more than me.