From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: fetch : fetches tags? Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:47:51 -0800 Message-ID: <7v3ashs5yg.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <479E9063.5000403@nrlssc.navy.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git Mailing List To: Brandon Casey X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 29 03:48:42 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JJgWf-0000wV-Sg for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:48:42 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753081AbYA2CsL (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:48:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752556AbYA2CsK (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:48:10 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:41042 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752534AbYA2CsJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:48:09 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328BB1304; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:48:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97121303; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:48:03 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <479E9063.5000403@nrlssc.navy.mil> (Brandon Casey's message of "Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:33:07 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Brandon Casey writes: > I expect these to fetch tags automatically (and they do): > > git fetch > git pull > git fetch > git pull > > I expect these to _not_ fetch tags (and they don't): > > git fetch > git pull > > But, I did not expect these to fetch tags: > > git fetch : > git pull : Sigh... that matches my expectation. Did we break it when we overhauled "git fetch", or was this an independent "improvement" that happened long before that?