From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use FIX_UTF8_MAC to enable conversion from UTF8-MAC to UTF8 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 03:29:14 -0800 Message-ID: <7v3asrzab9.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Mark Junker , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jan 21 12:30:00 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JGuqh-0006Ku-Sw for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:29:56 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758141AbYAUL30 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:29:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758033AbYAUL30 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:29:26 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:36319 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757891AbYAUL30 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:29:26 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C7542C8; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:29:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3BF142C7; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:29:20 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:24:20 +0000 (GMT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > - it contains questions in the commit message? WTF? Should it not be > marked as PATCH/RFC, possibly without a signoff to make sure that you > want to discuss it first? Sign-off is about "this is kosher, from licensing point of view" and nothing else. Please do not suggest otherwise. I do not mind discussions during the feature freeze as long as it stays at "feeler" level.