From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do check_repository_format() early Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:36:03 -0800 Message-ID: <7v3aunb0q4.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20071128165837.GA5903@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org To: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Dec 01 03:36:37 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IyIDb-0003aU-FG for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 03:36:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758242AbXLACgP (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:36:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758230AbXLACgP (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:36:15 -0500 Received: from sceptre.pobox.com ([207.106.133.20]:40218 "EHLO sceptre.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757962AbXLACgP (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:36:15 -0500 Received: from sceptre (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sceptre.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD2E2F2; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:36:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sceptre.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D10269BA0D; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:36:26 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > >> The comment is clearly not clear enough. Maybe this? >> >> + if (!work_tree_env) { >> + retval = set_work_tree(gitdirenv); >> + /* config may override worktree (see >> set_work_tree comment) */ >> + check_repository_format(); >> + return retval; >> + } > > Perfect. Please make it so, and add my ACK. Looks sensible, but can this be accompanied with a trivial test to demonstrate the existing breakage?