From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Speedup recursive by flushing index only once for all entries Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:06:39 -0800 Message-ID: <7v3b6ibvtc.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <81b0412b0701040247k47e398e6q34dd5233bb5706f6@mail.gmail.com> <81b0412b0701040447u329dcf9bvcd7adb9e9d199f18@mail.gmail.com> <7v8xgileza.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <81b0412b0701050322u67131900xea969b2da9981a94@mail.gmail.com> <20070107163112.GA9336@steel.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 10 19:07:51 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H4hrP-0001dw-7P for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:07:39 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964937AbXAJSGw (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:06:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964932AbXAJSGw (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:06:52 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28]:50960 "EHLO fed1rmmtao11.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965011AbXAJSGv (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:06:51 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20070110180649.KSHW25875.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:06:49 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 9W5y1W00U1kojtg0000000; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:05:59 -0500 To: Alex Riesen In-Reply-To: <20070107163112.GA9336@steel.home> (Alex Riesen's message of "Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:31:12 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: fork0@t-online.de (Alex Riesen) writes: > Alex Riesen, Fri, Jan 05, 2007 12:22:39 +0100: >> >So let's step back a bit. >> >> Excellent analysis, thanks! I suspect heavily it will work as is. >> Now, if only someone could find time to code it up... >> > > I'm sorry for asking (because I'm partly guilty in the mess the > merge-recursive is), but could you accept at least the patch which > started the thread? It's not as if it breaks something, or giving > wrong ideas, or anything. It's incomplete, but so long noone seem to > be able to find the time to finish the job, the patch will improve the > state of affairs a bit, will it not? I'm hacking on this right now.