From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: selective git-update-index per diff(1) chunks Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:38:13 -0800 Message-ID: <7v3b7zalsq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:38:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Alexey Dobriyan" Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org In-Reply-To: (Peter Baumann's message of "Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:33:48 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gq6j3-0002f7-V6 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:38:42 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936475AbWLALiP (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:38:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S936477AbWLALiP (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:38:15 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao12.cox.net ([68.230.241.27]:56503 "EHLO fed1rmmtao12.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936475AbWLALiO (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:38:14 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20061201113813.OBLL4226.fed1rmmtao12.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:38:13 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id tPeN1V00Q1kojtg0000000; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 06:38:23 -0500 To: Peter Baumann Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Peter Baumann writes: > I don't think it belongs in the plumbing, the git-update-index but I > think something like this would be very usefull. > > AFAIR darcs has this functionality. It selectively ask for each hunk if > it should be commited. This would be awfull to have in git. I concur, on both counts. My own now-defunct Porcelain had the darcs style interactive hunk selection because it felt so useful (and sometimes it was).