From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Allow pack header preprocessing before unpack-objects/index-pack. Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 15:50:08 -0800 Message-ID: <7v3b92zpzj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <11624187853116-git-send-email-nico@cam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 23:50:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org In-Reply-To: <11624187853116-git-send-email-nico@cam.org> (Nicolas Pitre's message of "Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:06:20 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfPqY-0001Cq-Rs for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 00:50:15 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750855AbWKAXuK (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:50:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750897AbWKAXuK (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:50:10 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao09.cox.net ([68.230.241.30]:58591 "EHLO fed1rmmtao09.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750882AbWKAXuJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:50:09 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061101235008.MQKO16798.fed1rmmtao09.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:50:08 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id hbqD1V00G1kojtg0000000 Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:50:13 -0500 To: Nicolas Pitre Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Rather nicely done. I see upto 2/6 are identical to what has sitting in "pu" for the past few days, modulo some indentation? I wonder how much testing has this series seen, by the way. Also, I wonder what happens after 5/6 errors out. It dies and the caller (typically receive-pack) reports it back, which would fail the push (and does not update the refs). Retrying in such a case would probably use the same set of refs on both ends, resulting in exactly the same pack...